These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33909720)

  • 1. Influence of Low-Dose Protocols of CBCT on Dental Implant Planning.
    de Castro HS; Kehrwald R; Matheus RA; Gomes AF; Queiroz PM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):307-312. PubMed ID: 33909720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Voxel Size on CBCT Images for Dental Implants Planning.
    Kehrwald R; Castro HS; Salmeron S; Matheus RA; Santaella GM; Queiroz PM
    Eur J Dent; 2022 May; 16(2):381-385. PubMed ID: 34902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.
    Liljeholm R; Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Hellén-Halme K; Shi XQ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28944361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
    de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
    Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Mandibular Angulation on Pre-Implant Site Measurement Accuracy Using CBCT.
    Önem E; Baksı BG; Turhal RI; Şen BH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):937–943. PubMed ID: 34157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
    Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?
    Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Fontenele RC; Oliveira-Santos N; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5281-5291. PubMed ID: 33625608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
    Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artifacts caused by titanium implants in CBCT images of the mandible: an experimental study.
    Fardim KAC; Machado AH; Assis NMSP; Sotto-Maior BS; Mauad LQ; Devito KL
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 34978995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Sun Z; Smith T; Kortam S; Kim DG; Tee BC; Fields H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e117-27. PubMed ID: 21300222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 25569395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-dose CBCT imaging of alveolar buccal bone adjacent to mandibular anterior teeth- a pilot study.
    Ruetters M; Gehrig H; Kronsteiner D; Doll S; Kim TS; Lux CJ; Sen S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4173-4182. PubMed ID: 35103838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Silva IM; Freitas DQ; Ambrosano GM; Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 23184166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear measurement accuracy of CBCT panoramic reconstructions: experimental study with dry human mandibles.
    Almeida VSM; Bomfim RT; Sobreira ACR; Barbosa IDS; Leite-Ribeiro PM; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32936399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.