These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33910271)
1. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Garg R; Singh A; Aggarwal M; Bhalla J; Mohan BP; Burke C; Rustagi T; Chahal P Clin Endosc; 2021 May; 54(3):379-389. PubMed ID: 33910271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Underwater Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Garg R; Singh A; Mohan BP; Mankaney G; Regueiro M; Chahal P Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1884-E1894. PubMed ID: 33269325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Yamashina T; Hanaoka N; Setoyama T; Watanabe J; Banno M; Marusawa H Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e17261. PubMed ID: 34540484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. Choi AY; Moosvi Z; Shah S; Roccato MK; Wang AY; Hamerski CM; Samarasena JB Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Feb; 93(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 33068608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection. Tan DJH; Ng CH; Lim XC; Lim WH; Yuen LZH; Koh JH; Nistala KRY; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah MD Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E154-E162. PubMed ID: 35047346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps. Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps. Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for removing sessile colorectal polyps: a propensity-score matched cohort study. Chien HC; Uedo N; Hsieh PH Endosc Int Open; 2019 Nov; 7(11):E1528-E1536. PubMed ID: 31681832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis. Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3003-3013. PubMed ID: 32577813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kamal F; Khan MA; Lee-Smith W; Khan Z; Sharma S; Tombazzi C; Ahmad D; Ismail MK; Howden CW; Binmoeller KF Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1264-E1272. PubMed ID: 33015327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Rodríguez Sánchez J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Pellisé M; Coto-Ugarte D; Uchima H; Aranda-Hernández J; Santiago García J; Marín-Gabriel JC; Riu Pons F; Nogales O; Carreño Macian R; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Hernández L; Patrón GO; Rodriguez-Tellez M; Redondo-Cerezo E; Sánchez Alonso M; Daca M; Valdivielso-Cortazar E; Álvarez Delgado A; Enguita M; Montori S; Albéniz E Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 May; 97(5):941-951.e2. PubMed ID: 36572129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]