These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33910755)

  • 1. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Arola D; Øilo M
    Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 33910755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.
    Schriwer C; Skjold A; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28662859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
    Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of margin design on fracture load of zirconia crowns.
    Skjold A; Schriwer C; Øilo M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Feb; 127(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 30467907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness.
    Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of artificial aging on high translucent dental zirconia: simulation of early failure.
    Skjold A; Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Dec; 128(6):526-534. PubMed ID: 33058363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Endodontic Access Preparation on Fracture Load of Translucent versus Conventional Zirconia Crowns with Varying Occlusal Thicknesses.
    Nejat AH; Dupree P; Kee E; Xu X; Zakkour W; Odom M; Bruggers K; Mascarenhas F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):706-710. PubMed ID: 33484219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
    Bulut AC; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An
    Narayanan V; Narayanan V; Devanarayanan SA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Feb; 21(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 32381825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.
    Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fractographic analysis of 35 clinically fractured bi-layered and monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Skjold A; Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104271. PubMed ID: 36041673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monolithic crowns fracture analysis: The effect of material properties, cusp angle and crown thickness.
    Shahmoradi M; Wan B; Zhang Z; Wilson T; Swain M; Li Q
    Dent Mater; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 32534794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.
    Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.
    Altamimi AM; Tripodakis AP; Eliades G; Hirayama H
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 24757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance and failure mode of layered translucent zirconia with different crown designs.
    Al-Qaysi SH; Saleh ARM; El-Damanhoury HM
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Feb; 41(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 34483200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of occlusal groove on abutment, crown thickness, and cement-type on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Tsuyuki Y; Sato T; Nomoto S; Yotsuya M; Koshihara T; Takemoto S; Yoshinari M
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):843-850. PubMed ID: 29962415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia crowns with different occlusal thicknesses in implant prostheses.
    Lan TH; Liu PH; Chou MM; Lee HE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26412004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.