These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Assessment of the Dentinal Surface Adaptation Efficacy of Different Obturation Systems with Bioceramic Sealer: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Singh AK; Raj K; Mailankote S; Gopakumar R; Jayachandran M; Uthman US J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Aug; 23(8):834-838. PubMed ID: 37283019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study. Chew ST; Eshak Z; Al-Haddad A Microsc Res Tech; 2023 Jul; 86(7):754-761. PubMed ID: 37078493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. Kuçi A; Alaçam T; Yavaş O; Ergul-Ulger Z; Kayaoglu G J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1627-31. PubMed ID: 25260735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microscopic evaluation of sealer penetration and interfacial adaptation of three different endodontic sealers: An Majumdar TK; Mukherjee S; Mazumdar P J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(5):435-439. PubMed ID: 35399776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study. Casino Alegre A; Aranda Verdú S; Zarzosa López JI; Plasencia Alcina E; Rubio Climent J; Pallarés Sabater A Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10388. PubMed ID: 36097475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer. Al-Hiyasat AS; Alfirjani SA J Dent; 2019 Oct; 89():103169. PubMed ID: 31326527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bioceramic and epoxy resin sealers in terms of marginal adaptation and tubular penetration depth with different obturation techniques in premolar teeth: A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Najafzadeh R; Fazlyab M; Esnaashari E J Family Med Prim Care; 2022 May; 11(5):1794-1797. PubMed ID: 35800496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methods. Turkyilmaz A; Erdemir A Microsc Res Tech; 2020 Dec; 83(12):1544-1551. PubMed ID: 32735400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of the Marginal Adaptation of Various Root Canal Sealers at the Dentin-Sealer and Sealer-Guttapercha Interfaces at Three Root Canal Levels: An In Vitro Study. Gpv S; Ghosh M; Chatterjee R; Gajpal A; Mustafa M; Almokhatieb AA Cureus; 2024 Aug; 16(8):e66156. PubMed ID: 39233925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial Percolation and Sealer Tubular Penetration in a Polymer-based Obturation System Compared with Warm Vertical Condensation Technique: An Giovarruscio M; Argueta-Alvarado MH; Torres-Méndez F; Dávila-Pérez CE; Cerda-Cristerna BI; Sauro S; Foschi F Iran Endod J; 2020; 15(4):246-252. PubMed ID: 36704115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study Comparing 3 Obturation Techniques to Seal Dentin to Root Canal Bioceramic Sealer in 30 Freshly Extracted Mandibular Second Premolars. Alghamdi NS; Alamoudi RA; Baba SM; Mattoo K; Abu Hawi RH; Ali WN; Almadhlami NMH; Lahiq AMA Med Sci Monit; 2023 May; 29():e940599. PubMed ID: 37179453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Confocal Microscopic Study on Percentage Penetration of Different Sealers into Dentin. D'Costa VF; Rodrigues AL; Bangera MK; Bhat PA; Rai RU J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S725-S730. PubMed ID: 34447190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intratubular penetration ability in the canal perimeter using HiFlow bioceramic sealer with warm obturation techniques and single cone. Casino-Alegre A; Aranda-Verdú S; Zarzosa-López JI; Rubio-Climent J; Plasencia-Alcina E; Pallarés-Sabater A J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e639-e645. PubMed ID: 36046173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root Reinforcement after Obturation with Calcium Silicate-based Sealer and Modified Gutta-percha Cone. Osiri S; Banomyong D; Sattabanasuk V; Yanpiset K J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1843-1848. PubMed ID: 30384982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of obturation achieved by a non-gutta-percha-based root filling system in single-rooted canals. Selem LC; Li GH; Niu LN; Bergeron BE; Bortoluzzi EA; Chen JH; Pashley DH; Tay FR J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2003-8. PubMed ID: 25262034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Analysis of Interfacial Adaptation and Depth Penetration of Recent HiFlow versus Regular Bioceramic Sealers in Conjunction with BC Gutta-Percha Points Using Two Different Obturation Techniques-A Preliminary Report of an Ex Vivo Study. Abu-Zeid ST; Alamoudi RA J Funct Biomater; 2024 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 38786645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the interface between gutta-percha and two types of sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Eltair M; Pitchika V; Hickel R; Kühnisch J; Diegritz C Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1631-1639. PubMed ID: 29080076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Different Obturation Techniques on Sealer Penetration in Teeth with Artificial Internal Root Resorption: a Confocal Laser Microscope Analysis. Uğur Aydin Z; Kara İC; Er Karaoğlu G; Doğan Çankaya T Chin J Dent Res; 2023 Mar; 26(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 36988066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]