These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33912004)

  • 1. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.
    Chen J; Wang Z; Dong R; Fu X; Wang Y; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():643205. PubMed ID: 33912004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effects of wireless audio microphones on sentences recognition threshold for hearing aid users in noise].
    Chen J; Dong RJ; Liu DX; Wang Y; Wang S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 33(10):951-953. PubMed ID: 31623041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
    Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. .Signal Transparency of Remote Microphone Technology in Pediatric Bone Conduction Device Users.
    Sanchez C; Morgenstein K; Snapp H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):360-370. PubMed ID: 37271142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children.
    Gustafson SJ; Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):635-650. PubMed ID: 33465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology.
    Wesarg T; Arndt S; Wiebe K; Schmid F; Huber A; Mülder HE; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Speck I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of wireless remote microphone application on speech discrimination in noise in children with cochlear implants.
    Mehrkian S; Bayat Z; Javanbakht M; Emamdjomeh H; Bakhshi E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():192-195. PubMed ID: 31369931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.