These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33913085)

  • 1. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience.
    Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
    Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.
    Tomov ST; Gorchev GA; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova NH; Tomova VD; Gorcheva ZV; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1367-1382. PubMed ID: 35142980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
    Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study.
    Maggioni A; Minig L; Zanagnolo V; Peiretti M; Sanguineti F; Bocciolone L; Colombo N; Landoni F; Roviglione G; Vélez JI
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Oct; 115(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 19638333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-centre experience from India.
    Sekhon R; Naithani A; Makkar P; R P; Sharma P; Rawal S; Goyal Y; Mitra S; Sharma A; Mehta A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):935-941. PubMed ID: 34709536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
    Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.