These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33913558)

  • 1. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of nine commercial RT-PCR kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Colombia.
    Hernández C; Florez C; Castañeda S; Ballesteros N; Martínez D; Castillo A; Muñoz M; Gomez S; Rico A; Pardo L; Paniz-Mondolfi A; Ramírez JD
    J Med Virol; 2021 Sep; 93(9):5618-5622. PubMed ID: 33913558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of 12 qualitative RT-PCR commercial kits for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
    Altamimi AM; Obeid DA; Alaifan TA; Taha MT; Alhothali MT; Alzahrani FA; Albarrag AM
    J Med Virol; 2021 May; 93(5):3219-3226. PubMed ID: 33629747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low clinical performance of the Isopollo COVID-19 detection kit (M Monitor, South Korea) for RT-LAMP SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis: A call for action against low quality products for developing countries.
    Freire-Paspuel B; Garcia-Bereguiain MA
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Mar; 104():303-305. PubMed ID: 33434671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays: A feasible alternative approach with low technical requirements.
    Visseaux B; Collin G; Houhou-Fidouh N; Le Hingrat Q; Ferré VM; Damond F; Ichou H; Descamps D; Charpentier C
    J Virol Methods; 2021 May; 291():114086. PubMed ID: 33577957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study on the efficiency of commercial reverse transcriptase-Polymerase chain reaction kits for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections.
    Ramalingam G; Dhanasezhian A; Murugesan A; Saminathan G; Sivathanu L
    Indian J Public Health; 2022; 66(3):276-281. PubMed ID: 36149104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of seven commercial RT-PCR kits for COVID-19 testing in pooled clinical specimens.
    Garg A; Ghoshal U; Patel SS; Singh DV; Arya AK; Vasanth S; Pandey A; Srivastava N
    J Med Virol; 2021 Apr; 93(4):2281-2286. PubMed ID: 33230819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of six nucleic acid amplification kits for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection.
    Wu S; Shi X; Chen Q; Jiang Y; Zuo L; Wang L; Jiang M; Lin Y; Fang S; Peng B; Wu W; Liu H; Zhang R; Kwan PSL; Hu Q
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2021 May; 20(1):38. PubMed ID: 34022903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisite Clinical Validation of Isothermal Amplification-Based SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays Using Different Sampling Strategies.
    Desai KT; Alfaro K; Mendoza L; Faron M; Mesich B; Maza M; Dominguez R; Valenzuela A; Acosta CD; Martínez M; Felix JC; Masch R; Smith JS; Gabrilovich S; Wu T; Plump M; Novetsky AP; Einstein MH; Douglas NC; Cremer M; Wentzensen N
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0084621. PubMed ID: 34668736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
    Dundon WG; Settypalli TBK; Spiegel K; Steinrigl A; Revilla-Fernández S; Schmoll F; Naletoski I; Lamien CE; Cattoli G
    J Virol Methods; 2021 Sep; 295():114200. PubMed ID: 34087339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.
    Banko A; Petrovic G; Miljanovic D; Loncar A; Vukcevic M; Despot D; Cirkovic A
    Viruses; 2021 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 34372527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of a SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay and RT-PCR for Improved COVID-19 Diagnosis.
    Aoki K; Takai K; Nagasawa T; Kashiwagi K; Mori N; Matsubayashi K; Satake M; Tanaka I; Kodama N; Shimodaira T; Ishii Y; Miyazaki T; Ishii T; Morita T; Yoshimura T; Tateda K
    Ann Lab Med; 2021 Nov; 41(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 34108284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive control synthesis method for COVID-19 diagnosis by one-step real-time RT-PCR.
    Cho H; Jung YH; Cho HB; Kim HT; Kim KS
    Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Dec; 511():149-153. PubMed ID: 33058837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic tests based on the RT-PCR reaction in the diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Tymoniuk B; Zmora P; Latowska J; Grabowska A; Ciesiołka A; Joachimiak P; Figura G; Borowiec M; Rolle K; Handschuh L; Fiszer A
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2021; 75(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 34328283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three molecular diagnostic assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Evaluation of analytical sensitivity and clinical performance.
    Kim HN; Yoon SY; Lim CS; Yoon J
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2022 Feb; 36(2):e24242. PubMed ID: 35019184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups.
    Menchinelli G; Bordi L; Liotti FM; Palucci I; Capobianchi MR; Sberna G; Lalle E; Romano L; De Angelis G; Marchetti S; Sanguinetti M; Cattani P; Posteraro B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 59(8):1468-1476. PubMed ID: 33823089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of COVID-19 laboratory diagnosis by commercial kits: Effectivity of RT-PCR to the RT-LAMP.
    Artik Y; Coşğun AB; Cesur NP; Hızel N; Uyar Y; Sur H; Ayan A
    J Med Virol; 2022 May; 94(5):1998-2007. PubMed ID: 34997587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance verification of five commercial RT-qPCR diagnostic kits for SARS-CoV-2.
    Yang M; Cao S; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Zheng R; Li Y; Zhou J; Zong C; Cao D; Qin X
    Clin Chim Acta; 2022 Jan; 525():46-53. PubMed ID: 34902345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid, Sensitive, and Specific Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Detection: A Multicenter Comparison Between Standard Quantitative Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction and CRISPR-Based DETECTR.
    Brandsma E; Verhagen HJMP; van de Laar TJW; Claas ECJ; Cornelissen M; van den Akker E
    J Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 223(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 33535237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Evaluation of AccuPower COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples.
    Suh IB; Lim J; Kim HS; Rhim G; Kim H; Kim H; Lee SM; Park HS; Song HJ; Hong M; Shin GS; Kim MJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263341. PubMed ID: 35143538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal swab samples by the Roche cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 test and a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test.
    Pujadas E; Ibeh N; Hernandez MM; Waluszko A; Sidorenko T; Flores V; Shiffrin B; Chiu N; Young-Francois A; Nowak MD; Paniz-Mondolfi AE; Sordillo EM; Cordon-Cardo C; Houldsworth J; Gitman MR
    J Med Virol; 2020 Sep; 92(9):1695-1698. PubMed ID: 32383179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.