These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33913795)

  • 41. Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.
    Krueger M; Schulte M; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Meis M; Brand T; Holube I
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):378-392. PubMed ID: 29049622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.
    Lundberg EMH; Chon SH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4300-4313. PubMed ID: 33253602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
    Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
    Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech.
    Souza PE; Arehart KH; Shen J; Anderson M; Kates JM
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():526. PubMed ID: 25999874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.
    Pittman AL; Stewart EC
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231177509. PubMed ID: 37254534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners with hearing aids.
    Zaar J; Simonsen LB; Laugesen S
    Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 443():108949. PubMed ID: 38281473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC; Vormann M; Latzel M; Mülder HE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech.
    Yoho SE; Barrett TS; Borrie SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 66(10):4025-4036. PubMed ID: 37652059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Laboratory Evaluation of Contextual Factors Affecting Ratings of Speech in Noise: Implications for Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Jenstad LM; Gillen L; Singh G; DeLongis A; Pang F
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):823-832. PubMed ID: 30557223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1543-1554. PubMed ID: 27997667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2903-13. PubMed ID: 10335639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.