These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33914000)

  • 1. Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Bordin D; Castro MB; Carvalho MA; Araujo AM; Cury AADB; Lazari-Carvalho PC
    Braz Dent J; 2021; 32(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 33914000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Batista VES; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer DP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29267521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Implant Diameter and Bruxism on Biomechanical Performance in Maxillary All-on-4 Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Sezer T; Kilic K; Esim E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 35904827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
    Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Li X; Staden RV; Hong G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the veneer-framework interface on the mechanical behavior of ceramic veneers: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Lazari PC; Sotto-Maior BS; Rocha EP; de Villa Camargos G; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):857-63. PubMed ID: 24721502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical effect of an occlusal device for patients with an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis under parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Silva LS; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Martins CM; Pellizzer EP; de Souza Batista VE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):223.e1-223.e8. PubMed ID: 34099274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of short dental implants in the posterior maxilla.
    Kim S; Kim S; Choi H; Woo D; Park YB; Shim JS; Kim HS; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):e155-64. PubMed ID: 24683580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign.
    Lima de Andrade C; Carvalho MA; Bordin D; da Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28291847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
    Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.
    Güçlü ZB; Gürbüz A; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R; Oyar P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 35972416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.