46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33914320)
1. Evaluation of the consistency ratios of cervical smear, cervical biopsy and conization results.
Keskin N; Biyik I; Ince O; Gokten H; Simsek S; Soysal C; Erten O
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(11):778-783. PubMed ID: 33914320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histopathological discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and LEEP-conization observed during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Pruski D; Przybylski M; Millert-Kalinska S; Zmaczynski A; Jach R
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 36043301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.
Jung Y; Lee AR; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Park DC; Park EK
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2018 Jul; 61(4):477-488. PubMed ID: 30018902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Large Retrospective Study of 12714 Cases of LEEP Conization Focusing on Cervical Cancer That Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy Failed to Detect.
Cong Q; Song Y; Wang Q; Zhang H; Gao S; Du M; Xie F; Dong J; Feng H; Diao W; Zhu C; Sui L
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5138232. PubMed ID: 29854761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A LEEP cervical conization is rarely indicated for a two-step discrepancy.
Lanneau GS; Skaggs V; Moore K; Stowell S; Zuna R; Gold MA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Jul; 11(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 17596756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Ding J; Xu H; Xia L; Cao S; Wu Q
Front Surg; 2021; 8():721545. PubMed ID: 34616768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Cai L; Huang Y; Lin C; Liu G; Mao X; Dong B; Lu T; Sun P
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Feb; 9(2):949-957. PubMed ID: 35117440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) following cervical biopsy diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Aly FZ; Irhayyim A; Knapik J; Klein R
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2021; 14(12):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 35027995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Colposcopic Biopsy Results of Patients Who have Cytomorphological Normal but HPV 16-18 or Other High-Risk HPV Subtypes Positive.
Aydoğmuş H; Aydoğmuş S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):417-420. PubMed ID: 30803201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Cervix After Cervical Conization by Transvaginal Elastography.
Xie M; Zhang X; Yu M; Wang W; Hua K
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1109-1114. PubMed ID: 29044684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of the missed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma under the microscope in HSIL diagnosed by colposcopy-guided biopsy and related influencing factors].
Qian XY; You ZX; Cao QW; Zou BB; Xing Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):613-619. PubMed ID: 30293297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of clinical features of cervical precancerous lesions in postmenopausal women].
Liu YY; Guo RX; Li BJ; Wu Y; Bai J; Li LX; Wang CF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 33631883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
