149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33914959)
1. Validation of questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix II: the EDEN Fragrance Study.
Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Elsner P; Gonçalo M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar MLA; Svedman C; Svensson Å; Ofenloch R
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2021 Aug; 35(8):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 33914959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Ofenloch R; Elsner P; Goncalo M; Isaksson M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar ML; Svensson Å; Diepgen T
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 182(4):955-964. PubMed ID: 31206595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Allergic reactivity for different dilutions of eugenol in repeated open application test and patch testing.
Ofenloch RF; Andersen KE; Foti C; Giménez-Arnau AM; Mowitz M; Salvador JFS; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Aug; 89(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 37218587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship-A repeated open application test (ROAT) study.
Bennike NH; Palangi L; Christensson JB; Nilsson U; Zachariae C; Johansen JD; Hagvall L
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Apr; 80(4):208-216. PubMed ID: 30378136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Menné T; Avnstorp C; Kasting GB; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 19486000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to fragrance mix I-EDEN Fragrance Study Group.
Bruze M; Mowitz M; Ofenloch R; Coenraads PJ; Diepgen TL; Elsner P; Gonçalo M; Naldi L; Svensson Å
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Aug; 81(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 30810228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens.
Katsarma G; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10515097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the optimal duration for a ROAT? The experience of the French Dermatology and Allergology group (DAG).
Amsler E; Assier H; Soria A; Bara C; Ferrier le Bouëdec MC; Barbaud A; Milpied B; Giordano-Labadie F; Pasteur J; Badaoui A; Valois A; Castelain F; Kurihara F; Castagna J; Boulard C; Bernier C; Leleu C; Marcant P; Crépy MN; Tetart F; Raison-Peyron N;
Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Aug; 87(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 35383393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact Allergy to Fragrance Mix II and Hydroxyisohexyl 3-Cyclohexene Carboxaldehyde: A Retrospective Study by International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Bruze M; Ale I; Andersen KE; Cannavó A; Diepgen T; Elsner P; Goh CL; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; McFadden J; Nixon R; Puangpet P; Sasseville D;
Dermatitis; 2020; 31(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 32265353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Fragrances.
Reeder MJ
Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 32475515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [How common is fragrance allergy really?].
Geier J; Brans R
Hautarzt; 2020 Mar; 71(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 31965209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests.
Johansen JD; Andersen KE; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 8879928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reactivity to sorbitan sesquioleate affects reactivity to fragrance mix I.
Geier J; Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Nov; 73(5):296-304. PubMed ID: 26329727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous sensitivity to fragrances.
Buckley DA; Basketter DA; Smith Pease CK; Rycroft RJ; White IR; McFadden JP
Br J Dermatol; 2006 May; 154(5):885-8. PubMed ID: 16634891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lyral is an important sensitizer in patients sensitive to fragrances.
Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Rastogi SC; Bruze M; Andersen KE; Lepoittevin JP; Giménez Arnau E; Pirker C; Goossens A; White IR
Br J Dermatol; 1999 Dec; 141(6):1076-83. PubMed ID: 10606855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review.
Scheinman PL
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 8796745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
