BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33915001)

  • 1. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
    Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
    Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
    Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
    Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in women with endometrial cancer: interobserver reproducibility among ultrasound experts and gynecologists.
    Eriksson LS; Lindqvist PG; Flöter Rådestad A; Dueholm M; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Jokubkiene L; Leone FP; Savelli L; Sladkevicius P; Testa AC; Van den Bosch T; Ameye L; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 25092412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI-based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer.
    Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Halle MK; Forsse D; Trovik J; Smit N; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6444-6455. PubMed ID: 35332408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver agreement in MRI assessment of severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
    Finazzo F; D'antonio F; Masselli G; Forlani F; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Minneci G; Gambarini S; Timor-Tritsch I; Prefumo F; Buca D; Liberati M; Khalil A; Cali G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):467-473. PubMed ID: 31237043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Spagnol G; Noventa M; Bonaldo G; Marchetti M; Vitagliano A; Laganà AS; Cavallin F; Scioscia M; Saccardi C; Tozzi R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 60(5):604-611. PubMed ID: 35656849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: prospective comparative study.
    Cubo-Abert M; Díaz-Feijoo B; Bradbury M; Rodríguez-Mías NL; Vera M; Pérez-Hoyos S; Gómez-Cabeza JJ; Gil-Moreno A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):469-475. PubMed ID: 33533532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of MRI and high-resolution transvaginal sonography for the local staging of cervical cancer.
    Moloney F; Ryan D; Twomey M; Hewitt M; Barry J
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Feb; 44(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26294324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interobserver variability of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging in cervical cancer.
    Tummers P; Gerestein K; Mens JW; Verstraelen H; van Doorn H
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 23640293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of assessment of severity of pelvic endometriosis using transvaginal ultrasound.
    Holland TK; Hoo WL; Mavrelos D; Saridogan E; Cutner A; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 41(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 22745055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial.
    Epstein E; Testa A; Gaurilcikas A; Di Legge A; Ameye L; Atstupenaite V; Valentini AL; Gui B; Wallengren NO; Pudaric S; Cizauskas A; Måsbäck A; Zannoni GF; Kannisto P; Zikan M; Pinkavova I; Burgetova A; Dundr P; Nemejcova K; Cibula D; Fischerova D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Mar; 128(3):449-53. PubMed ID: 23022593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer?
    Haldorsen IS; Lura N; Blaakær J; Fischerova D; Werner HMJ
    Curr Oncol Rep; 2019 Jul; 21(9):77. PubMed ID: 31359169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standard 1.5-T MRI of endometrial carcinomas: modest agreement between radiologists.
    Haldorsen IS; Husby JA; Werner HM; Magnussen IJ; Rørvik J; Helland H; Trovik J; Salvesen ØO; Espeland A; Salvesen HB
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Jul; 22(7):1601-11. PubMed ID: 22453859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of intravaginal ultrasound gel for local staging of cervical carcinoma on MRI.
    Atcı N; Özgür T; Öztürk F; Dolapçıoğlu KS
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1104-1107. PubMed ID: 27442344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
    Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Mei R; Kessler L; Pabst KM; Weber M; Schmidkonz C; Rischpler C; Zacho HD; Hope T; Schwarzenböck SM; Allen-Auerbach M; Emmett L; Ferdinandus J; Unterrainer M; Schaarschmidt BM; Umutlu L; Farolfi A; Castellucci P; Nanni C; Telo S; Fanti S; Herrmann K; Fendler WP
    J Nucl Med; 2023 Jul; 64(7):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 37230530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasonography Scanning for Preoperative Assessment of High Risk in Women with Endometrial Cancer.
    Yang T; Tian S; Li Y; Tian X; Wang W; Zhao J; Pei M; Zhao M; Wang L; Quan S; Yang X
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Mar; 25():2024-2031. PubMed ID: 30883538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.