These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33915082)
41. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study. Ma S; Zhang K; Li R; Lu J; Wu T; Liu Z; Fu X; Tang Q; Ma J Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e1-112.e9. PubMed ID: 35090820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fascia lata preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: rationale and outcome. Yao K; Zou ZJ; Li ZS; Zhou FJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Han H Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):642-7. PubMed ID: 23876593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study. Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study]. Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis. Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Combined Partial Penectomy With Bilateral Robotic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Using Near-infrared Fluorescence Guidance. Sávio LF; Panizzutti Barboza M; Alameddine M; Ahdoot M; Alonzo D; Ritch CR Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():251. PubMed ID: 29191642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Outcomes following radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer using a fascial-sparing surgical technique. Schifano N; Fallara G; Rezvani S; Pozzi E; Churchill J; Castiglione F; Rewhorn M; Hadway P; Nigam R; Rees R; Sangar V; Lau M; Parnham A; Alnajjar H; Muneer A World J Urol; 2023 Jun; 41(6):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 37019998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in pelvic node-positive penile cancer after lymph node dissection: a multi-institutional study. Sharma P; Djajadiningrat R; Zargar-Shoshtari K; Catanzaro M; Zhu Y; Nicolai N; Horenblas S; Spiess PE Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):496.e17-23. PubMed ID: 26072110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for localized carcinoma of the prostate: a comparison of 3 surgical techniques. Herrell SD; Trachtenberg J; Theodorescu D J Urol; 1997 Apr; 157(4):1337-9. PubMed ID: 9120934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes. Koifman L; Hampl D; Koifman N; Vides AJ; Ornellas AA J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2086-92. PubMed ID: 23770135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in penile cancer patients: a comparison of computed tomography, Cloquet's node, and disease burden of inguinal lymph nodes. Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Jiang ZX; Zhou XY Onkologie; 2008 Feb; 31(1-2):37-41. PubMed ID: 18268397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Modified videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy through suprafascial approach: Technical description and preliminary surgical outcomes. Juárez-Soto Á; Canales-Casco N; Quintero-Gómez V; Ruiz-Rosety E; de Paz-Suárez M; Campanario-Pérez R Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Oct; 46(8):456-463. PubMed ID: 35803871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in penile cancer may impact survival. Zargar-Shoshtari K; Sharma P; Djajadiningrat R; Catanzaro M; Ye DW; Zhu Y; Nicolai N; Horenblas S; Spiess PE World J Urol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 26026817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer. Yang M; Liu Z; Tan Q; Hu X; Liu Y; Wei L; Deng C; Zhou S; Yang N; Duan G; Zheng Y; Li X; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Zheng J BMC Surg; 2023 Mar; 23(1):55. PubMed ID: 36915083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Optimizing the approach for lymph node dissection during laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Ghazi A; Zimmermann R; Al-Bodour A; Shefler A; Janetschek G Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 19577355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Double-channel expansion of the subcutaneous lower abdominal tunnel for sequential inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer - Report of six cases]. Liang Y; Xu LQ; Wang K; Yuan J; Wang X; Zu XB; Yu Y; Liu XM Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2023 Jul; 29(7):645-648. PubMed ID: 38619414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The risk factors for the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma patients with inguinal lymph node dissection. Liu JY; Li YH; Zhang ZL; Yao K; Ye YL; Xie D; Han H; Liu ZW; Qin ZK; Zhou FJ World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 23455885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]