292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33915714)
21. Fructus Xanthii-Inspired Low Dynamic Noise Dry Bioelectrodes for Surface Monitoring of ECG.
Niu X; Wang L; Li H; Wang T; Liu H; He Y
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2022 Feb; 14(4):6028-6038. PubMed ID: 35044157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Signal Quality and Electrode-Skin Impedance Evaluation in the Context of Wearable Electroencephalographic Systems.
Zhao Z; Ivanov K; Lubich L; Omisore OM; Mei Z; Fu N; Chen J; Wang L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4965-4968. PubMed ID: 30441456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Wearable Smart Textiles for Long-Term Electrocardiography Monitoring-A Review.
Nigusse AB; Mengistie DA; Malengier B; Tseghai GB; Langenhove LV
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of wearable textile electrodes for ECG monitoring.
Tsukada YT; Tokita M; Murata H; Hirasawa Y; Yodogawa K; Iwasaki YK; Asai K; Shimizu W; Kasai N; Nakashima H; Tsukada S
Heart Vessels; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1203-1211. PubMed ID: 30680493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Low-Power High-Data-Transmission Multi-Lead ECG Acquisition Sensor System.
Wang LH; Zhang W; Guan MH; Jiang SY; Fan MH; Abu PAR; Chen CA; Chen SL
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 31744095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Properties of screen printed electrocardiography smartware electrodes investigated in an electro-chemical cell.
Rattfält L; Björefors F; Nilsson D; Wang X; Norberg P; Ask P
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Jul; 12():64. PubMed ID: 23827015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Design of a Wearable 12-Lead Noncontact Electrocardiogram Monitoring System.
Hsu CC; Lin BS; He KY; Lin BS
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 30925752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fabric-Based Wearable Dry Electrodes for Body Surface Biopotential Recording.
Yokus MA; Jur JS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Feb; 63(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 26241969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Properties of different types of dry electrodes for wearable smart monitoring devices.
Popović-Maneski L; Ivanović MD; Atanasoski V; Miletić M; Zdolšek S; Bojović B; Hadžievski L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2020 Aug; 65(4):405-415. PubMed ID: 32238599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time based measurement of the impedance of the skin-electrode interface for dry electrode ECG recording.
Dozio R; Baba A; Assambo C; Burke MJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5001-4. PubMed ID: 18003129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of dry biopotential electrodes.
Xie L; Yang G; Xu L; Seoane F; Chen Q; Zheng L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1478-81. PubMed ID: 24109978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Graphene-Enabled Electrodes for Electrocardiogram Monitoring.
Celik N; Manivannan N; Strudwick A; Balachandran W
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2016 Aug; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 28335284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Amplifier input impedance in dry electrode ECG recording.
Assambo C; Burke MJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1774-7. PubMed ID: 19964015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flexible Graphene Electrodes for Prolonged Dynamic ECG Monitoring.
Lou C; Li R; Li Z; Liang T; Wei Z; Run M; Yan X; Liu X
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Nov; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 27809270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adaptive Motion Artifact Reduction in Wearable ECG Measurements Using Impedance Pneumography Signal.
An X; Liu Y; Zhao Y; Lu S; Stylios GK; Liu Q
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35897997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stretchable Sponge Electrodes for Long-Term and Motion-Artifact-Tolerant Recording of High-Quality Electrophysiologic Signals.
Lo LW; Zhao J; Aono K; Li W; Wen Z; Pizzella S; Wang Y; Chakrabartty S; Wang C
ACS Nano; 2022 Aug; 16(8):11792-11801. PubMed ID: 35861486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Highly Stretchable Dry Electrode Composited with Carbon Nanofiber (CNF) for Wearable Device.
Beak DH; Jung H; Kwon D; Lee SA; Yoon S; Kim YJ
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2020 Aug; 20(8):4708-4713. PubMed ID: 32126645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Determining the input impedance of ECG amplifiers using accurate electrode modelling.
Maji S; Burke MJ
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015030. PubMed ID: 33438618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Soft Bioelectronic Stickers: Selection and Evaluation of Skin-Interfacing Electrodes.
Lopes PA; Vaz Gomes D; Green Marques D; Faia P; Góis J; Patrício TF; Coelho J; Serra A; de Almeida AT; Majidi C; Tavakoli M
Adv Healthc Mater; 2019 Aug; 8(15):e1900234. PubMed ID: 31273945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study of a single lead ECG in a wearable device.
Funston R; Gibbs A; Diven J; Francey J; Easlea H; Murray S; Fitzpatrick M; Condon A; Mitchell ARJ
J Electrocardiol; 2022; 74():88-93. PubMed ID: 36055073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
