These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33916496)

  • 1. Estimation of Tissue Attenuation from Ultrasonic B-Mode Images-Spectral-Log-Difference and Method-of-Moments Algorithms Compared.
    Brandner DM; Cai X; Foiret J; Ferrara KW; Zagar BG
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33916496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A heterogeneous nonlinear attenuating full-wave model of ultrasound.
    Pinton GF; Dahl J; Rosenzweig S; Trahey GE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Mar; 56(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 19411208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft tissue absorption tomography with correction for scattering aberrations.
    Franceschini E; Pauzin MC; Mensah S; Groby JP
    Ultrason Imaging; 2005 Oct; 27(4):221-36. PubMed ID: 16761784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of acoustic nonlinearity on pulse-echo attenuation coefficient estimation from tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Coila A; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):805. PubMed ID: 32873024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
    Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time domain simulation of harmonic ultrasound images and beam patterns in 3D using the k-space pseudospectral method.
    Treeby BE; Tumen M; Cox BT
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 1):363-70. PubMed ID: 22003638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Micro-scale finite element modeling of ultrasound propagation in aluminum trabecular bone-mimicking phantoms: A comparison between numerical simulation and experimental results.
    Vafaeian B; Le LH; Tran TN; El-Rich M; El-Bialy T; Adeeb S
    Ultrasonics; 2016 May; 68():17-28. PubMed ID: 26894840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation estimation by repeatedly solving the forward scattering problem.
    Ilyina N; Hermans J; Verboven E; Van Den Abeele K; D'Agostino E; D'hooge J
    Ultrasonics; 2018 Mar; 84():201-209. PubMed ID: 29156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter.
    Jang HS; Lee MH; Park SB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3347963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel power spectrum calculation method using phase-compensation and weighted averaging for the estimation of ultrasound attenuation.
    Heo SW; Kim H
    Ultrasonics; 2010 May; 50(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20083291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal to noise ratio comparisons for ultrasound attenuation slope estimation algorithms.
    Omari EA; Varghese T
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032902. PubMed ID: 24593741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.
    Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Hall TJ; Zagzebski JA
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Jul; 35(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 23858055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation estimation using spectral cross-correlation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):510-9. PubMed ID: 17375820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A k-space method for large-scale models of wave propagation in tissue.
    Mast TD; Souriau LP; Liu DL; Tabei M; Nachman AI; Waag RC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Mar; 48(2):341-54. PubMed ID: 11370348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of the algorithms for estimating the ultrasonic attenuation along the propagation path.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Aug; 52(6):720-9. PubMed ID: 22424697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of tissue's elasticity with surface wave speed.
    Zhang X; Greenleaf JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2522-5. PubMed ID: 18189542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of nonlinear ultrasound propagation on high intensity brain therapy.
    Pinton G; Aubry JF; Fink M; Tanter M
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1207-16. PubMed ID: 21520833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.