168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3391781)
1. Breast radiation dose in film/screen mammography.
Prado KL; Rakowski JT; Barragan F; Vanek KN
Health Phys; 1988 Jul; 55(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3391781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Dosage loads and quality of the image in mammography].
Kozlov AP; Shishov VA; Telesh LV; Fedorov IuA
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1986; (3):74-9. PubMed ID: 3750831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
Klausz R; Shramchenko N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experimental study on image quality when using screens in mammography (author's transl)].
Maurer HJ; Goos F
Rofo; 1979 Mar; 130(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 155580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland].
Iwaszkiewicz K; Bończyk J
Pol Tyg Lek; 1991 Apr 22-29; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of radiation exposures between conventional and rare-earth screen/film systems.
Chu WK; Sangster W; Dobry CA
Health Phys; 1985 Nov; 49(5):958-61. PubMed ID: 4066354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dose measurements in pediatric excretory urography using a new film-screen combination].
Reither M; Brozik P; Schorn B
Rontgenpraxis; 1983 May; 36(5):170-2. PubMed ID: 6867863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical trial of mammography with film-screen-combinations. Part 1: Selection of a suitable film-screen system].
Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(11):458-66. PubMed ID: 7313855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
