These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33918239)
1. Drivers' Attention Strategies before Eyes-off-Road in Different Traffic Scenarios: Adaptation and Anticipation. Liu Z; Yuan W; Ma Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33918239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments. Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional Demand as a Function of Contextual Factors in Different Traffic Scenarios. Liu Z; Ahlström C; Forsman Å; Kircher K Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1171-1189. PubMed ID: 31424969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget. Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers. Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of methods for the assessment of attention while driving. Kircher K; Ahlstrom C Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():40-47. PubMed ID: 28341312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust. Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drivers' Visual Attention Characteristics under Different Cognitive Workloads: An On-Road Driving Behavior Study. Ma Y; Qi S; Zhang Y; Lian G; Lu W; Chan CY Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 32722496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data. Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the Difference Between Necessary and Unnecessary Glances Away From the Forward Roadway: An Occlusion Study on the Motorway. Kircher K; Kujala T; Ahlström C Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1117-1131. PubMed ID: 31403323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment. Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads. Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data. Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads. Pipkorn L; Dozza M; Tivesten E Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard. Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving. Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving. Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach. Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving. Konstantopoulos P; Chapman P; Crundall D Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):827-34. PubMed ID: 20380909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the relationship between occlusion times and in-car glance durations in simulated driving. Grahn H; Kujala T; Taipalus T; Lee J; Lee JD Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 182():106955. PubMed ID: 36630858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]