285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33918239)
1. Drivers' Attention Strategies before Eyes-off-Road in Different Traffic Scenarios: Adaptation and Anticipation.
Liu Z; Yuan W; Ma Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33918239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional Demand as a Function of Contextual Factors in Different Traffic Scenarios.
Liu Z; Ahlström C; Forsman Å; Kircher K
Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1171-1189. PubMed ID: 31424969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of methods for the assessment of attention while driving.
Kircher K; Ahlstrom C
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():40-47. PubMed ID: 28341312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drivers' Visual Attention Characteristics under Different Cognitive Workloads: An On-Road Driving Behavior Study.
Ma Y; Qi S; Zhang Y; Lian G; Lu W; Chan CY
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 32722496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the Difference Between Necessary and Unnecessary Glances Away From the Forward Roadway: An Occlusion Study on the Motorway.
Kircher K; Kujala T; Ahlström C
Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1117-1131. PubMed ID: 31403323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads.
Pipkorn L; Dozza M; Tivesten E
Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.
Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving.
Konstantopoulos P; Chapman P; Crundall D
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):827-34. PubMed ID: 20380909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the relationship between occlusion times and in-car glance durations in simulated driving.
Grahn H; Kujala T; Taipalus T; Lee J; Lee JD
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 182():106955. PubMed ID: 36630858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
