These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33919329)

  • 1. Role of Sensors in Error Propagation with the Dynamic Constrained Observability Method.
    Peng T; Nogal M; Casas JR; Turmo J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33919329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "This Is What We Don't Know": Treating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Networks for Risk Assessment.
    Sahlin U; Helle I; Perepolkin D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Jan; 17(1):221-232. PubMed ID: 33151017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aleatory-aware deep uncertainty quantification for transfer learning.
    Kabir HMD; Khanam S; Khozeimeh F; Khosravi A; Mondal SK; Nahavandi S; Acharya UR
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Apr; 143():105246. PubMed ID: 35131610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation and Memory Performance: Sources of Uncertainty in Epidemiological Cohort Studies.
    Brzozek C; Benke KK; Zeleke BM; Abramson MJ; Benke G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29587425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties can completely derail medical research results.
    Indrayan A
    J Postgrad Med; 2020; 66(2):94-98. PubMed ID: 32134004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal Multi-Type Sensor Placement for Structural Identification by Static-Load Testing.
    Bertola NJ; Papadopoulou M; Vernay D; Smith IFC
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 29240684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The epistemic and aleatory uncertainties of the ETAS-type models: an application to the Central Italy seismicity.
    Lombardi AM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11812. PubMed ID: 28924175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating Uncertainty in Benefits and Harms: A Review of Patient Decision Support Interventions.
    Bansback N; Bell M; Spooner L; Pompeo A; Han PKJ; Harrison M
    Patient; 2017 Jun; 10(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 27905072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty quantification for radiation measurements: Bottom-up error variance estimation using calibration information.
    Burr T; Croft S; Krieger T; Martin K; Norman C; Walsh S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Feb; 108():49-57. PubMed ID: 26698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progression of Geographic Atrophy: Epistemic Uncertainties Affecting Mathematical Models and Machine Learning.
    Arslan J; Benke KK
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 10(13):3. PubMed ID: 34727162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outlier-Detection Methodology for Structural Identification Using Sparse Static Measurements.
    Proverbio M; Bertola NJ; Smith IFC
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 29795035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disclosing the Uncertainty Associated with Prognostic Estimates in Breast Cancer.
    Engelhardt EG; Pieterse AH; Han PK; van Duijn-Bakker N; Cluitmans F; Maartense E; Bos MM; Weijl NI; Punt CJ; Quarles van Ufford-Mannesse P; Sleeboom H; Portielje JE; van der Hoeven KJ; Woei-A-Jin FJ; Kroep JR; de Haes HC; Smets EM; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 27681991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the need for restricting the probabilistic analysis in risk assessments to variability.
    Aven T
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):354-60; author reply 381-4. PubMed ID: 19919552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Derivative-Free Observability Analysis for Sensor Placement Optimization of Bioinspired Flexible Flapping Wing System.
    Jin B; Xu H; Peng J; Lu K; Lu Y
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2022 Oct; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 36412706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiscale Model for In-Stent Restenosis.
    Nikishova A; Veen L; Zun P; Hoekstra AG
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):761-774. PubMed ID: 30136082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.
    Pathmanathan P; Cordeiro JM; Gray RA
    Front Physiol; 2019; 10():721. PubMed ID: 31297060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A suggestion for the quantification of precise and bounded probability to quantify epistemic uncertainty in scientific assessments.
    Raices Cruz I; Troffaes MCM; Sahlin U
    Risk Anal; 2022 Feb; 42(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 35007348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Known unknowns and unknown unknowns in suicide risk assessment: evidence from meta-analyses of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty.
    Large M; Galletly C; Myles N; Ryan CJ; Myles H
    BJPsych Bull; 2017 Jun; 41(3):160-163. PubMed ID: 28584653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistic biosphere modeling for the long-term safety assessment of geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste using first- and second-order Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ciecior W; Röhlig KJ; Kirchner G
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Oct; 190-191():10-19. PubMed ID: 29734123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Epistemic Uncertainty in Offshore Wind Farm Production Capacity to Reduce Risk.
    Zitrou A; Bedford T; Walls L
    Risk Anal; 2022 Jul; 42(7):1524-1540. PubMed ID: 34837889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.