These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33919616)

  • 1. Transmission of Major and Minor Serum Proteins during Microfiltration of Skim Milk: Effects of Pore Diameters, Concentration Factors and Processing Stages.
    Li Z; Liu D; Xu S; Zhang W; Zhou P
    Foods; 2021 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33919616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature.
    Jørgensen CE; Abrahamsen RK; Rukke EO; Johansen AG; Schüller RB; Skeie SB
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6164-6179. PubMed ID: 27265169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of microfiltration concentration factor on serum protein removal from skim milk using spiral-wound polymeric membranes.
    Beckman SL; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6199-212. PubMed ID: 23891300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of linear velocity and flux on performance of ceramic graded permeability membranes when processing skim milk at 50°C.
    Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):2619-32. PubMed ID: 24612815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of soluble calcium and lactose on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Hurt EE; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7483-97. PubMed ID: 26298759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Production efficiency of micellar casein concentrate using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes.
    Beckman SL; Zulewska J; Newbold M; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct; 93(10):4506-17. PubMed ID: 20854984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microfiltration of skim milk and modified skim milk using a 0.1-µm ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure system at temperatures of 50, 55, 60, and 65°C.
    Hurt EE; Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Feb; 98(2):765-80. PubMed ID: 25497798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):167-82. PubMed ID: 26519975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of ceramic membrane channel geometry and uniform transmembrane pressure on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Hurt EE; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Nov; 98(11):7527-43. PubMed ID: 26298765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing factors that influence casein and serum protein separation by microfiltration.
    Hurt E; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Oct; 93(10):4928-41. PubMed ID: 20855027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serum protein removal from skim milk with a 3-stage, 3× ceramic Isoflux membrane process at 50°C.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2020-2034. PubMed ID: 23415524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flux and transmission of β-casein during cold microfiltration of skim milk subjected to different heat treatments.
    Zulewska J; Kowalik J; Dec B
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):10831-10843. PubMed ID: 30268614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pilot-scale crossflow-microfiltration and pasteurization to remove spores of Bacillus anthracis (Sterne) from milk.
    Tomasula PM; Mukhopadhyay S; Datta N; Porto-Fett A; Call JE; Luchansky JB; Renye J; Tunick M
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4277-91. PubMed ID: 21854901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concentration of Immunoglobulins in Microfiltration Permeates of Skim Milk: Impact of Transmembrane Pressure and Temperature on the IgG Transmission Using Different Ceramic Membrane Types and Pore Sizes.
    Heidebrecht HJ; Toro-Sierra J; Kulozik U
    Foods; 2018 Jun; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29958476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and optimization of a carbon dioxide-aided cold microfiltration process for the physical removal of microorganisms and somatic cells from skim milk.
    Fritsch J; Moraru CI
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Oct; 91(10):3744-60. PubMed ID: 18832196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shelf life and quality of skim milk processed by cold microfiltration with a 1.4-μm pore size membrane, with or without heat treatment.
    Wang D; Fritsch J; Moraru CI
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Oct; 102(10):8798-8806. PubMed ID: 31326174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A process efficiency assessment of serum protein removal from milk using ceramic graded permeability microfiltration membrane.
    Tremblay-Marchand D; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5230-5243. PubMed ID: 27132105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of casein on flux and passage of serum proteins during microfiltration using polymeric spiral-wound membranes at 50°C.
    Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2048-2060. PubMed ID: 23415517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the efficiency of removal of whey protein from sweet whey with ceramic microfiltration membranes.
    Carter B; DiMarzo L; Pranata J; Barbano DM; Drake M
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):7534-7543. PubMed ID: 33814142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of low concentration factor microfiltration on milk component recovery and Cheddar cheese yield.
    Neocleous M; Barbano DM; Rudan MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Oct; 85(10):2415-24. PubMed ID: 12416793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.