These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33920087)
21. Objective Assessment of Robotic Surgical Technical Skill: A Systematic Review. Chen J; Cheng N; Cacciamani G; Oh P; Lin-Brande M; Remulla D; Gill IS; Hung AJ J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):461-469. PubMed ID: 30053510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task. Lau E; Alkhamesi NA; Schlachta CM Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2551-2559. PubMed ID: 31482359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Video-based surgical skill assessment using 3DÂ convolutional neural networks. Funke I; Mees ST; Weitz J; Speidel S Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Jul; 14(7):1217-1225. PubMed ID: 31104257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Precise application of Traditional Chinese Medicine in minimally-invasive techniques]. Dong FH Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2018 Jun; 31(6):493-496. PubMed ID: 29945400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review. Tesfai FM; Nagi J; Morrison I; Boal M; Olaitan A; Chandrasekaran D; Stoyanov D; Lanceley A; Francis N Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Aug; 103(8):1480-1497. PubMed ID: 38610108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring to Improve: Peer and Crowd-sourced Assessments of Technical Skill with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Ghani KR; Miller DC; Linsell S; Brachulis A; Lane B; Sarle R; Dalela D; Menon M; Comstock B; Lendvay TS; Montie J; Peabody JO; Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):547-550. PubMed ID: 26755338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A review of training research and virtual reality simulators for the da Vinci surgical system. Liu M; Curet M Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 25584468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hamlyn CRM: a compact master manipulator for surgical robot remote control. Zhang D; Liu J; Zhang L; Yang GZ Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Mar; 15(3):503-514. PubMed ID: 31956954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using Contact Forces and Robot Arm Accelerations to Automatically Rate Surgeon Skill at Peg Transfer. Brown JD; O Brien CE; Leung SC; Dumon KR; Lee DI; Kuchenbecker KJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Sep; 64(9):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 28113295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of realistic force feedback in a robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery system. Moradi Dalvand M; Shirinzadeh B; Nahavandi S; Smith J Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Jun; 23(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 24328984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis]. Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. McKeown esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive technique-systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhou J; Xu J; Chen L; Hu J; Shu Y Dis Esophagus; 2022 Oct; 35(10):. PubMed ID: 35373248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A study on autonomous suturing task assignment in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Gao S; Ji S; Feng M; Lu X; Tong W Int J Med Robot; 2021 Feb; 17(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 33049099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Virtual Reality Warm-up Before Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Kelly JD; Kowalewski TM; Brand T; French A; Nash M; Meryman L; Heller N; Organ N; George E; Smith R; Sorensen MD; Comstock B; Lendvay TS J Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 264():107-116. PubMed ID: 33799119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery. Wang Z; Majewicz Fey A Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Dec; 13(12):1959-1970. PubMed ID: 30255463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads. Lee GI; Lee MR Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 28634632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]