These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33921421)

  • 1. Karyotype Aberrations in Action: The Evolution of Cancer Genomes and the Tumor Microenvironment.
    Baudoin NC; Bloomfield M
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 33921421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-cell sequencing reveals karyotype heterogeneity in murine and human malignancies.
    Bakker B; Taudt A; Belderbos ME; Porubsky D; Spierings DC; de Jong TV; Halsema N; Kazemier HG; Hoekstra-Wakker K; Bradley A; de Bont ES; van den Berg A; Guryev V; Lansdorp PM; Colomé-Tatché M; Foijer F
    Genome Biol; 2016 May; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 27246460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Karyotyping of aneuploid and polyploid plants from low coverage whole-genome resequencing.
    Zhao K; Bai Y; Zhang Q; Zhao Z; Cao Y; Yang L; Wang N; Xu J; Wang B; Wu L; Gong X; Lin T; Wang Y; Wang W; Cai X; Yin Y; Xiong Z
    BMC Plant Biol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):630. PubMed ID: 38062348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proliferative advantage of specific aneuploid cells drives evolution of tumor karyotypes.
    Ban I; Tomašić L; Trakala M; Tolić IM; Pavin N
    Biophys J; 2023 Feb; 122(4):632-645. PubMed ID: 36654508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chromosome-scale mega-haplotypes enable digital karyotyping of cancer aneuploidy.
    Bell JM; Lau BT; Greer SU; Wood-Bouwens C; Xia LC; Connolly ID; Gephart MH; Ji HP
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Nov; 45(19):e162. PubMed ID: 28977555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The consequences of tetraploidy and aneuploidy.
    Storchova Z; Kuffer C
    J Cell Sci; 2008 Dec; 121(Pt 23):3859-66. PubMed ID: 19020304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in the detection of chromosomal aberrations using spectral karyotyping.
    Bayani J; Squire JA
    Clin Genet; 2001 Feb; 59(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 11260203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the karyotypic origin and evolution of cancer cells.
    Nicholson JM; Duesberg P
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2009 Oct; 194(2):96-110. PubMed ID: 19781442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elevated tolerance to aneuploidy in cancer cells: estimating the fitness effects of chromosome number alterations by in silico modelling of somatic genome evolution.
    Valind A; Jin Y; Gisselsson D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70445. PubMed ID: 23894657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular karyotyping and aneuploidy detection in Arabidopsis thaliana using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction.
    Henry IM; Dilkes BP; Comai L
    Plant J; 2006 Oct; 48(2):307-19. PubMed ID: 16995901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer recurrence and lethality are enabled by enhanced survival and reversible cell cycle arrest of polyaneuploid cells.
    Pienta KJ; Hammarlund EU; Brown JS; Amend SR; Axelrod RM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(7):. PubMed ID: 33504594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chromosome Mis-segregation Generates Cell-Cycle-Arrested Cells with Complex Karyotypes that Are Eliminated by the Immune System.
    Santaguida S; Richardson A; Iyer DR; M'Saad O; Zasadil L; Knouse KA; Wong YL; Rhind N; Desai A; Amon A
    Dev Cell; 2017 Jun; 41(6):638-651.e5. PubMed ID: 28633018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tolerance of whole-genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution.
    Dewhurst SM; McGranahan N; Burrell RA; Rowan AJ; Grönroos E; Endesfelder D; Joshi T; Mouradov D; Gibbs P; Ward RL; Hawkins NJ; Szallasi Z; Sieber OM; Swanton C
    Cancer Discov; 2014 Feb; 4(2):175-185. PubMed ID: 24436049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage.
    Carp H; Toder V; Aviram A; Daniely M; Mashiach S; Barkai G
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):678-82. PubMed ID: 11287018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling specific aneuploidies: from karyotype manipulations to biological insights.
    Truong MA; Cané-Gasull P; Lens SMA
    Chromosome Res; 2023 Aug; 31(3):25. PubMed ID: 37640903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Chromosomal Rearrangements on the Interpretation of Lupin Karyotype Evolution.
    Susek K; Bielski W; Czyż KB; Hasterok R; Jackson SA; Wolko B; Naganowska B
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 30939837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stochastic cancer progression driven by non-clonal chromosome aberrations.
    Heng HH; Stevens JB; Liu G; Bremer SW; Ye KJ; Reddy PV; Wu GS; Wang YA; Tainsky MA; Ye CJ
    J Cell Physiol; 2006 Aug; 208(2):461-72. PubMed ID: 16688757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centrosome amplification and instability occurs exclusively in aneuploid, but not in diploid colorectal cancer cell lines, and correlates with numerical chromosomal aberrations.
    Ghadimi BM; Sackett DL; Difilippantonio MJ; Schröck E; Neumann T; Jauho A; Auer G; Ried T
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Feb; 27(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 10612807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of detecting numerical versus structural chromosome aberrations.
    Kirsch-Volders M; Vanhauwaert A; De Boeck M; Decordier I
    Mutat Res; 2002 Jul; 504(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 12106654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst.
    Victor AR; Griffin DK; Brake AJ; Tyndall JC; Murphy AE; Lepkowsky LT; Lal A; Zouves CG; Barnes FL; McCoy RC; Viotti M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 30418565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.