286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33921451)
21. Segmentation of the prostate, its zones, anterior fibromuscular stroma, and urethra on the MRIs and multimodality image fusion using U-Net model.
Rezaeijo SM; Jafarpoor Nesheli S; Fatan Serj M; Tahmasebi Birgani MJ
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Oct; 12(10):4786-4804. PubMed ID: 36185056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advanced zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging vs. full-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection: a radiomic features study.
Hu L; Zhou DW; Fu CX; Benkert T; Jiang CY; Li RT; Wei LM; Zhao JG
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1760-1769. PubMed ID: 32935192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prostate heterogeneity correlates with clinical features on multiparametric MRI.
Chen C; Yang Z; Sweeney E; Hectors SJ; Hu JC; Margolis DJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Nov; 46(11):5369-5376. PubMed ID: 34292363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation of Prostate in T2W MRI.
Khan Z; Yahya N; Alsaih K; Ali SSA; Meriaudeau F
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32503330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiparametric MRI for Suspected Recurrent Prostate Cancer after HIFU:Is DCE still needed?
Lotte R; Lafourcade A; Mozer P; Conort P; Barret E; Comperat E; Ezziane M; de Guibert PJ; Tavolaro S; Belin L; Boudghene F; Lucidarme O; Renard-Penna R
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3760-3769. PubMed ID: 29633004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Selecting proper combination of mpMRI sequences for prostate cancer classification using multi-input convolutional neuronal network.
Wang Y; Wang M
Phys Med; 2020 Dec; 80():92-100. PubMed ID: 33137624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. T1 and T2 MR fingerprinting measurements of prostate cancer and prostatitis correlate with deep learning-derived estimates of epithelium, lumen, and stromal composition on corresponding whole mount histopathology.
Shiradkar R; Panda A; Leo P; Janowczyk A; Farre X; Janaki N; Li L; Pahwa S; Mahran A; Buzzy C; Fu P; Elliott R; MacLennan G; Ponsky L; Gulani V; Madabhushi A
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1336-1346. PubMed ID: 32876839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biparametric vs multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of prostate cancer in treatment-naïve patients: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alabousi M; Salameh JP; Gusenbauer K; Samoilov L; Jafri A; Yu H; Alabousi A
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):209-220. PubMed ID: 30929292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Segmentation of the Prostate Transition Zone and Peripheral Zone on MR Images with Deep Learning.
Bardis M; Houshyar R; Chantaduly C; Tran-Harding K; Ushinsky A; Chahine C; Rupasinghe M; Chow D; Chang P
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2021 May; 3(3):e200024. PubMed ID: 33929265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated prostate multi-regional segmentation in magnetic resonance using fully convolutional neural networks.
Jimenez-Pastor A; Lopez-Gonzalez R; Fos-Guarinos B; Garcia-Castro F; Wittenberg M; Torregrosa-Andrés A; Marti-Bonmati L; Garcia-Fontes M; Duarte P; Gambini JP; Bittencourt LK; Kitamura FC; Venugopal VK; Mahajan V; Ros P; Soria-Olivas E; Alberich-Bayarri A
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):5087-5096. PubMed ID: 36690774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exploring the efficacy of multi-flavored feature extraction with radiomics and deep features for prostate cancer grading on mpMRI.
Khanfari H; Mehranfar S; Cheki M; Mohammadi Sadr M; Moniri S; Heydarheydari S; Rezaeijo SM
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):195. PubMed ID: 37993801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Susceptibility artifacts and PIRADS 3 lesions in prostatic MRI: how often is the dynamic contrast-enhance sequence necessary?
Antunes N; Vas D; Sebastia C; Salvador R; Ribal MJ; Nicolau C
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jul; 46(7):3401-3409. PubMed ID: 33683430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection and segmentation in low-risk patients using a convolutional neural network on multi-parametric MRI.
Arif M; Schoots IG; Castillo Tovar J; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Niessen W; Veenland JF
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6582-6592. PubMed ID: 32594208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI.
Bao J; Wang X; Hu C; Hou J; Dong F; Guo L
Eur J Radiol Open; 2017; 4():123-128. PubMed ID: 29034282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fully automated localization of prostate peripheral zone tumors on apparent diffusion coefficient map MR images using an ensemble learning method.
Zabihollahy F; Ukwatta E; Krishna S; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Apr; 51(4):1223-1234. PubMed ID: 31456317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fully automated quantification of in vivo viscoelasticity of prostate zones using magnetic resonance elastography with Dense U-net segmentation.
Aldoj N; Biavati F; Dewey M; Hennemuth A; Asbach P; Sack I
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2001. PubMed ID: 35132102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on apparent diffusion coefficient and T2w MRI for histogram and texture analysis with respect to focal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Daniel M; Kuess P; Andrzejewski P; Nyholm T; Helbich T; Polanec S; Dragschitz F; Goldner G; Georg D; Baltzer P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 May; 195(5):402-411. PubMed ID: 30478670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pulse Sequence Dependence of a Simple and Interpretable Deep Learning Method for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI.
Kim H; Margolis DJA; Nagar H; Sabuncu MR
Acad Radiol; 2023 May; 30(5):966-970. PubMed ID: 36334976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What is the most effective tool for detecting prostate cancer using a standard MR scanner?
Osugi K; Tanimoto A; Nakashima J; Shinoda K; Hashiguchi A; Oya M; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013 Dec; 12(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24172787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
