These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33922543)

  • 1. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Facial Measurements of Digital Photographs and Wrapped Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Photographs.
    Alhammadi MS; Al-Mashraqi AA; Alnami RH; Ashqar NM; Alamir OH; Halboub E; Reda R; Testarelli L; Patil S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33922543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults.
    Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C
    Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of cone beam CT for morphometry of nasolabial soft tissue in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Xu W; Lu R; Hu Y; Cao L; Wang T; Tan H; Meng X; Ming Y; Zheng L
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 34719475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate registration of cone-beam computed tomography scans to 3-dimensional facial photographs.
    Nahm KY; Kim Y; Choi YS; Lee J; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 24485741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anthropometric Comparison of 3-Dimensional Facial Scan Taken With a Low-Cost Facial Scanner With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scan.
    Aljawad H; Lim HJ; Lee KC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):1456-1458. PubMed ID: 36731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linear accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and a 3-dimensional facial scanning system: An anthropomorphic phantom study.
    Oh SH; Kang JH; Seo YK; Lee SR; Choi HY; Choi YS; Hwang EH
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Jun; 48(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29963482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of facial soft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jun; 199(1-3):9-14. PubMed ID: 20236780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):127-34. PubMed ID: 20951517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
    Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and Reliability of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Condyle Measurements. A Human Cadaver Study.
    García-Sanz V; Bellot-Arcís C; Hernández V; Serrano-Sánchez P; Guarinos J; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11993. PubMed ID: 28931867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
    Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT.
    Dusseldorp JK; Stamatakis HC; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):921-930. PubMed ID: 27206862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Measurements Using Cone-Beam CT Images According to the Measurement Methods.
    Hwang HS; Choe SY; Hwang JS; Moon DN; Hou Y; Lee WJ; Wilkinson C
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 25845397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.