These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33924135)
1. A Smart Sensing System of Water Quality and Intake Monitoring for Livestock and Wild Animals. Tang W; Biglari A; Ebarb R; Pickett T; Smallidge S; Ward M Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33924135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Livestock-wildlife joint land use in dry lands of Kenya: a case study of the Lolldaiga Hills ranch. Mizutani F; Kadohira M; Phiri B Anim Sci J; 2012 Jun; 83(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 22694337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a system for monitoring individual feeding and drinking behaviour and intake in young cattle. Oliveira BR; Ribas MN; Machado FS; Lima JAM; Cavalcanti LFL; Chizzotti ML; Coelho SG Animal; 2018 Mar; 12(3):634-639. PubMed ID: 28820079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring the drinking behaviour of individual pigs housed in group using radio frequency identification (RFID). Maselyne J; Adriaens I; Huybrechts T; De Ketelaere B; Millet S; Vangeyte J; Van Nuffel A; Saeys W Animal; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1557-66. PubMed ID: 25959418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility study on the spatial and temporal movement of Samburu's cattle and wildlife in Kenya using GPS radio-tracking, remote sensing and GIS. Raizman EA; Rasmussen HB; King LE; Ihwagi FW; Douglas-Hamilton I Prev Vet Med; 2013 Aug; 111(1-2):76-80. PubMed ID: 23711505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sources of variability in livestock water quality over 5 years in the Northern Great Plains. Petersen MK; Muscha JM; Mulliniks JT; Waterman RC; Roberts AJ; Rinella MJ J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1792-801. PubMed ID: 26020200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wildlife Monitoring on the Edge: A Performance Evaluation of Embedded Neural Networks on Microcontrollers for Animal Behavior Classification. Dominguez-Morales JP; Duran-Lopez L; Gutierrez-Galan D; Rios-Navarro A; Linares-Barranco A; Jimenez-Fernandez A Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33922753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial and temporal interactions between livestock and wildlife in South Central Spain assessed by camera traps. Kukielka E; Barasona JA; Cowie CE; Drewe JA; Gortazar C; Cotarelo I; Vicente J Prev Vet Med; 2013 Nov; 112(3-4):213-21. PubMed ID: 24050782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using radio frequency identification for behavioral monitoring in little blue penguins. L Kalafut K; Kinley R J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2020; 23(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 30724589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Bayesian networks in predicting contamination of drinking water with E. coli in rural Vietnam. Hall DC; Le QB Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2017 Jun; 111(6):270-277. PubMed ID: 29044368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring individual feeding and drinking behavior and intake in group-housed cattle. Chapinal N; Veira DM; Weary DM; von Keyserlingk MA J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5732-6. PubMed ID: 18024766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stray voltage and milk quality: a review. Reinemann DJ Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2012 Jul; 28(2):321-45. PubMed ID: 22664211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pond bank access as an approach for managing toxic cyanobacteria in beef cattle pasture drinking water ponds. Wilson AE; Chislock MF; Yang Z; Barros MUG; Roberts JF Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):247. PubMed ID: 29574498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Drinking behavior of lactating dairy cows and prediction of their water intake. Cardot V; Le Roux Y; Jurjanz S J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jun; 91(6):2257-64. PubMed ID: 18487648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic milking and grazing--effects of location of drinking water on water intake, milk yield, and cow behavior. Spörndly E; Wredle E J Dairy Sci; 2005 May; 88(5):1711-22. PubMed ID: 15829663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical issues and alternatives for the establishment of chemical water quality criteria for livestock. Valente-Campos S; Spry DJ; Pascale Palhares JC; Jakomin Rudez LM; Umbuzeiro GA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jun; 104():108-114. PubMed ID: 30872016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle and selected wildlife species at selected livestock/wildlife interface areas of the Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe. Ndengu M; Matope G; de Garine-Wichatitsky M; Tivapasi M; Scacchia M; Bonfini B; Pfukenyi DM Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():158-165. PubMed ID: 28992921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of livestock farming activity on the quality of surface water. Cesoniene L; Dapkiene M; Sileikiene D Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(32):32678-32686. PubMed ID: 30467746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pasture BMP effectiveness using an HRU-based subarea approach in SWAT. Sheshukov AY; Douglas-Mankin KR; Sinnathamby S; Daggupati P J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():276-84. PubMed ID: 26517276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]