167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33924189)
1. Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component.
Kumar R; Dubey R; Singh S; Singh S; Prakash C; Nirsanametla Y; Królczyk G; Chudy R
Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 33924189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework for the selection of sustainable biodegradable polymer for food packaging applications.
Mahajan A; Singh I; Arora N
Environ Dev Sustain; 2023 Mar; ():1-22. PubMed ID: 37362995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A combined FE-hybrid MCDM framework for improving the performance of the conical stem tibial design for TAR with the addition of pegs.
Jyoti ; Ghosh R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jul; 237():107574. PubMed ID: 37148636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2021 Nov; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 34945903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods.
Bid S; Siddique G
Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e01956. PubMed ID: 31294108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada.
El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Apr; 165():36-43. PubMed ID: 30851926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application.
Mian SH; Abouel Nasr E; Moiduddin K; Saleh M; Abidi MH; Alkhalefah H
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30867. PubMed ID: 38770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection.
Rashid T; Ali A; Chu YM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246738. PubMed ID: 33561144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The biomechanics of a validated finite element model of stress shielding in a novel hybrid total knee replacement.
Bougherara H; Zdero R; Mahboob Z; Dubov A; Shah S; Schemitsch EH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Oct; 224(10):1209-19. PubMed ID: 21138239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of surgical alignment and soft tissue conditions on the kinematics and wear of a fixed bearing total knee replacement.
Johnston H; Abdelgaied A; Pandit H; Fisher J; Jennings LM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 31408775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prioritization of water erosion-prone sub-watersheds using three ensemble methods in Qareaghaj catchment, southern Iran.
Pourghasemi HR; Honarmandnejad F; Rezaei M; Tarazkar MH; Sadhasivam N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jul; 28(28):37894-37917. PubMed ID: 33723776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prioritizing the glucose-lowering medicines for type 2 diabetes by an extended fuzzy decision-making approach with target-based attributes.
Eghbali-Zarch M; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R; Esfahanian F; Masoud S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Aug; 60(8):2423-2444. PubMed ID: 35776373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.
C S; Subramaniam SK
Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management.
Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z
Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral component loosening in high-flexion total knee replacement: an in vitro comparison of high-flexion versus conventional designs.
Bollars P; Luyckx JP; Innocenti B; Labey L; Victor J; Bellemans J
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Oct; 93(10):1355-61. PubMed ID: 21969434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach.
Zhang H; Peng Y; Tian G; Wang D; Xie P
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177578. PubMed ID: 28498864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model.
Aghajani Mir M; Taherei Ghazvinei P; Sulaiman NM; Basri NE; Saheri S; Mahmood NZ; Jahan A; Begum RA; Aghamohammadi N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():109-15. PubMed ID: 26496840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
