176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33924669)
1. Tumor Biological Feature and Its Association with Positive Surgical Margins and Apical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy in Non-Metastasis Prostate Cancer.
Wang S; Du P; Cao Y; Yang X; Yang Y
Curr Oncol; 2021 Apr; 28(2):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 33924669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Shakir A; Cacciamani G; Mariotto A; Brunelli M; Bernasconi R; Novella G; De Marco V; Artibani W
Arab J Urol; 2019; 17(3):234-242. PubMed ID: 31489241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endogenous testosterone density is an independent predictor of pelvic lymph node invasion in high-risk prostate cancer: results in 201 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Panunzio A; Mazzucato G; Cerrato C; Gallina S; Bianchi A; Rizzetto R; Amigoni N; Serafin E; Cianflone F; Orlando R; Gentile I; Migliorini F; Zecchini Antoniolli S; Di Filippo G; Brunelli M; Pagliarulo V; Cerruto MA; Antonelli A
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Mar; 54(3):541-550. PubMed ID: 35044553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nerve Sparing during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Increases the Risk of Ipsilateral Positive Surgical Margins.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Stomps S; Witjes JA; van Basten JPA
J Urol; 2020 Jul; 204(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 31971494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel Approach for Apical Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The "Collar" Technique.
Bianchi L; Turri FM; Larcher A; De Groote R; De Bruyne P; De Coninck V; Goossens M; D'Hondt F; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Mottrie A
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 29402756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
Pellegrino F; Falagario UG; Knipper S; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Aly M; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38155061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative MRI-based estimation of risk for positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: development and validation of a simple scoring system.
Park MY; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4898-4907. PubMed ID: 33386982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.
Ryu JH; Kim YB; Jung TY; Ko WJ; Kim SI; Kwon D; Kim DY; Oh TH; Yoo TK
J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(41):e256. PubMed ID: 34697927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metabolic syndrome and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are associated with adverse pathological features in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.
Lebdai S; Mathieu R; Leger J; Haillot O; Vincendeau S; Rioux-Leclercq N; Fournier G; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Doucet L; Azzouzi AR; Rigaud J; Renaudin K; Charles T; Bruyere F; Fromont G
Urol Oncol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):80.e17-80.e24. PubMed ID: 29153942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.
Yossepowitch O; Briganti A; Eastham JA; Epstein J; Graefen M; Montironi R; Touijer K
Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 23932439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive Association between Preoperative Total Testosterone Levels and Risk of Positive Surgical Margins by Prostate Cancer: Results in 476 Consecutive Patients Treated Only by Radical Prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Pocessali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Mariotto A; Inverardi D; Brunelli M; Iacovelli R; Romano M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29975957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
