These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33926052)

  • 1. A Landslide Monitoring System for Natural Terrain in Korea: Development and Application in Hazard Evaluations.
    Song YS; Chae BG; Kim KS; Park JY; Oh HJ; Jeong SW
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33926052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey).
    Karsli F; Atasoy M; Yalcin A; Reis S; Demir O; Gokceoglu C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Sep; 156(1-4):241-55. PubMed ID: 18780152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IoT-Based Geotechnical Monitoring of Unstable Slopes for Landslide Early Warning in the Darjeeling Himalayas.
    Abraham MT; Satyam N; Pradhan B; Alamri AM
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 32375265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of climate change on landslide hazard in Central Italy.
    Alvioli M; Melillo M; Guzzetti F; Rossi M; Palazzi E; von Hardenberg J; Brunetti MT; Peruccacci S
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():1528-1543. PubMed ID: 29554770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of potential changes in landslide susceptibility and landslide occurrence frequency in China under climate change.
    Lin Q; Steger S; Pittore M; Zhang J; Wang L; Jiang T; Wang Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 850():158049. PubMed ID: 35981587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Different Slope Units Based on BP Neural Network.
    Huang J; Zeng X; Ding L; Yin Y; Li Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9923775. PubMed ID: 35655489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of substrata of a slope susceptible to landslide in hilly environment using a geophysical method in the Nilgiris, India.
    Mathangi B; Zaalishvili VB; Ganapathy GP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(59):123966-123982. PubMed ID: 37996577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model in Rwanda.
    Nsengiyumva JB; Luo G; Nahayo L; Huang X; Cai P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29385096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding complex slope deformation through tree-ring analyses.
    Šilhán K; Tichavský R; Fabiánová A; Chalupa V; Chalupová O; Škarpich V; Tolasz R
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 665():1083-1094. PubMed ID: 30893740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilization of 3D Laser Scanning for Stability Evaluation and Deformation Monitoring of Landslides.
    Guo Y; Li X; Ju S; Lyu Q; Liu T
    J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():8225322. PubMed ID: 35910751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in parts of Garhwal Himalaya, India, using the weight of evidence modelling.
    Guri PK; Ray PK; Patel RC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jun; 187(6):324. PubMed ID: 25944750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Landslide susceptibility assessment and validation in the framework of municipal planning in Portugal: the case of Loures Municipality.
    Guillard C; Zezere J
    Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):721-35. PubMed ID: 22864551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis on Two Typical Landslide Hazard Phenomena in The Wenchuan Earthquake by Field Investigations and Shaking Table Tests.
    Yang C; Zhang J; Liu F; Bi J; Jun Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Aug; 12(8):9181-98. PubMed ID: 26258785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of shallow landslide occurrence: Validation of a physically-based approach through a real case study.
    Schilirò L; Montrasio L; Scarascia Mugnozza G
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 569-570():134-144. PubMed ID: 27341114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Effective, Single-Frequency GPS Network as a Tool for Landslide Monitoring.
    Zuliani D; Tunini L; Di Traglia F; Chersich M; Curone D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping landslide susceptibility using data-driven methods.
    Zêzere JL; Pereira S; Melo R; Oliveira SC; Garcia RAC
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jul; 589():250-267. PubMed ID: 28262363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).
    Wang Y; Sun D; Wen H; Zhang H; Zhang F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32545618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal Subdivision for Treatment and Management of Catastrophic Landslides in a Watershed Using Topographic Factors.
    Lin CY; Fu KL; Lin CY
    Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 58(5):833-842. PubMed ID: 27605227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multidimensional stability model for predicting shallow landslide size and shape across landscapes.
    Milledge DG; Bellugi D; McKean JA; Densmore AL; Dietrich WE
    J Geophys Res Earth Surf; 2014 Nov; 119(11):2481-2504. PubMed ID: 26213663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques.
    Pardeshi SD; Autade SE; Pardeshi SS
    Springerplus; 2013; 2():523. PubMed ID: 25674398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.