BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33926219)

  • 1. Evaluation of Maximum DNA Yield from a New Noninvasive Buccal Collection Device Following Various Extraction Protocols.
    Pißarreck M; Moreira F; Foley M
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2021 May; 25(5):376-380. PubMed ID: 33926219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Extraction and Recovery Efficiency of Pure DNA for Different Types of Swabs.
    Bruijns BB; Tiggelaar RM; Gardeniers H
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 29890011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Buccal DNA samples for DNA typing: new collection and processing methods.
    Burger MF; Song EY; Schumm JW
    Biotechniques; 2005 Aug; 39(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 16116799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applied Biosystems™ PrepFiler™ Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Manual and Semi-automated via AutoMate Express™).
    Foley MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():53-81. PubMed ID: 37439975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of DNA extraction and sampling methods for successful forensic microbiome analyses of the skin and saliva.
    Yu KM; Lee AM; Cho HS; Lee JW; Lim SK
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 36416962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Use of buccal swab as a source of genomic DNA for genetic screening in patients with age-related macular degeneration].
    Xu YL; Zhou HY; Xu J; Liu NP
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 48(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 22490945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a normalized extraction to further aid in fast, high-throughput processing of forensic DNA reference samples.
    Connon CC; LeFebvre AK; Benjamin RC
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():112-124. PubMed ID: 27566134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of NucleoSpin® Forensic Filters on DNA recovery from trace DNA swabs.
    Heathfield LJ; Hitewa AN; Gibbon A; Mole CG
    Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):284-287. PubMed ID: 35598922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of the high-quality 'rapid method for swab' to genotype the HTTLPR serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphism.
    Maloney B; Ray B; Hayden EP; Nurnberger JI; Lahiri DK
    Psychiatr Genet; 2009 Apr; 19(2):72-82. PubMed ID: 19668112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simplified buccal DNA extraction with FTA Elute Cards.
    Wolfgramm Ede V; de Carvalho FM; Aguiar VR; Sartori MP; Hirschfeld-Campolongo GC; Tsutsumida WM; Louro ID
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 19215882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Buccal swabbing and extraction of high quality sunfish (Lepomis) DNA for use in PCR analysis.
    Smalley JV; Campanella JJ
    Biotechniques; 2005 Feb; 38(2):188, 190,192. PubMed ID: 15727123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Powder-free DNA Extraction Workflow for Skeletal Samples.
    Harrel M; Hughes-Stamm S
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):601-609. PubMed ID: 31577371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Buccal DNA collection: comparison of buccal swabs with FTA cards.
    Milne E; van Bockxmeer FM; Robertson L; Brisbane JM; Ashton LJ; Scott RJ; Armstrong BK
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Apr; 15(4):816-9. PubMed ID: 16614129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental validation of the ANDE™ rapid DNA system with FlexPlex™ assay for arrestee and reference buccal swab processing and database searching.
    Carney C; Whitney S; Vaidyanathan J; Persick R; Noel F; Vallone PM; Romsos EL; Tan E; Grover R; Turingan RS; French JL; Selden RF
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():120-130. PubMed ID: 30818156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.