142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33926219)
41. Evaluation of buccal swabs for pharmacogenetics.
Ang JS; Aloise MN; Dawes D; Dempster MG; Fraser R; Paterson A; Stanley P; Suarez-Gonzalez A; Dawes M; Katzov-Eckert H
BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jun; 11(1):382. PubMed ID: 29898767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
Nori DV; McCord BR
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Internal validation of the RapidHIT
Wiley R; Sage K; LaRue B; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():180-188. PubMed ID: 29055861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Developmental validation of a fully integrated sample-to-profile rapid human identification system for processing single-source reference buccal samples.
Jovanovich S; Bogdan G; Belcinski R; Buscaino J; Burgi D; Butts ELR; Chear K; Ciopyk B; Eberhart D; El-Sissi O; Franklin H; Gangano S; Gass J; Harris D; Hennessy L; Kindwall A; King D; Klevenberg J; Li Y; Mehendale N; McIntosh R; Nielsen B; Park C; Pearson F; Schueren R; Stainton N; Troup C; Vallone PM; Vangbo M; Woudenberg T; Wyrick D; Williams S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():181-194. PubMed ID: 25621924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. High-throughput sequencing of forensic genetic samples using punches of FTA cards with buccal swabs.
Kampmann ML; Buchard A; Børsting C; Morling N
Biotechniques; 2016; 61(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 27625209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An Optimized DNA Analysis Workflow for the Sampling, Extraction, and Concentration of DNA obtained from Archived Latent Fingerprints.
Solomon AD; Hytinen ME; McClain AM; Miller MT; Dawson Cruz T
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 28382646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Application of the QIAamp DNA Investigator Kit and Prepfiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit in genomic DNA extraction from skeletal remains].
Ludwikowska-Pawłowska M; Jacewicz R; Jedrzejczyk M; Prośniak A; Berent J
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 20860301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Collection of genomic DNA by the noninvasive mouthwash method for use in pharmacogenetic studies.
Andrisin TE; Humma LM; Johnson JA
Pharmacotherapy; 2002 Aug; 22(8):954-60. PubMed ID: 12173798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Automated extraction of DNA from blood and PCR setup using a Tecan Freedom EVO liquid handler for forensic genetic STR typing of reference samples.
Stangegaard M; Frøslev TG; Frank-Hansen R; Hansen AJ; Morling N
J Lab Autom; 2011 Apr; 16(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21609694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Optimizing DNA yield from buccal swabs in the elderly: attempts to promote buccal cell growth in culture.
Vandenbergh DJ; Anthony K; Whitfield KE
Am J Hum Biol; 2003; 15(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 12953175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. New oral cut-off time limits in NSW.
Nittis M; Franco M; Cochrane C
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():92-97. PubMed ID: 27697690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash.
Feigelson HS; Rodriguez C; Robertson AS; Jacobs EJ; Calle EE; Reid YA; Thun MJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Sep; 10(9):1005-8. PubMed ID: 11535555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
Baechler S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation Of A Powder-Free DNA Extraction Method For Skeletal Remains.
Harrel M; Mayes C; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1819-1823. PubMed ID: 29411392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Non-Invasive DNA Sampling for Molecular Analysis of Beta-Thalassemia: Amiable Alternative Sampling Methods with Accurate Results for Pediatric Patients.
Abd Rahim MR; Kho SL; Kuppusamy UR; Tan JA
Clin Lab; 2015; 61(9):1325-30. PubMed ID: 26554253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of Skin Surface as an Alternative Source of Reference DNA Samples: A Pilot Study.
Albujja MH; Bin Dukhyil AA; Chaudhary AR; Kassab AC; Refaat AM; Babu SR; Okla MK; Kumar S
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):227-233. PubMed ID: 28230906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Buccal swabs and treated cards: methodological considerations for molecular epidemiologic studies examining pediatric populations.
Beckett SM; Laughton SJ; Pozza LD; McCowage GB; Marshall G; Cohn RJ; Milne E; Ashton LJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(10):1260-7. PubMed ID: 18326872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
Thomasma SM; Foran DR
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
