151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33927843)
1. Skeletal and dental changes induced by the Flip-Lock Herbst appliance in the treatment of Angle's class II division 1 malocclusion during active growth period: A preliminary study.
Iyer SR; Premkumar S; Muruganandam M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2021; 15(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 33927843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental skeletal effects of the metallic splinted Herbst appliance after growth spurt: a lateral oblique cephalometric assessment.
Raveli TB; Raveli DB; Gandini LG; Santos-Pinto A
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2017 Aug; 30(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 29248942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.
Yang X; Zhu Y; Long H; Zhou Y; Jian F; Ye N; Gao M; Lai W
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 26306822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Twin Block appliance and Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children: a meta-analysis.
Xu F; Fang Y; Sui X; Yao Y
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):278. PubMed ID: 38409017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Orthodontic treatment of nongrowing patient with Class II Division 2 malocclusion by Herbst appliance].
Nedeljković N; Glisić B; Marković E; Sćepan I; Stamenković Z
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2009 Oct; 66(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 19938765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dental effects of Herbst appliance anchored with temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Al-Dboush R; Soltan R; Rao J; El-Bialy T
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 34145968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
González Espinosa D; Santos M; Mendes SMDA; Normando D
Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 31786599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No Compliance Correction of Class II Malocclusion in Growing Patients Whit HERBST Appliance: A Case Report.
Portelli M; Militi A; Cicciù M; Lo Giudice A; Cervino G; Fastuca R; Nucera R
Open Dent J; 2018; 12():605-613. PubMed ID: 30369969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
Mujagic M; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Katsaros C
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions.
Obijou C; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9294358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison.
Booij JW; Goeke J; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Ruf S
J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Jan; 74(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 23299649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
