173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33928244)
1. Bayesian Markov models improve the prediction of binding motifs beyond first order.
Ge W; Meier M; Roth C; Söding J
NAR Genom Bioinform; 2021 Jun; 3(2):lqab026. PubMed ID: 33928244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian Markov models consistently outperform PWMs at predicting motifs in nucleotide sequences.
Siebert M; Söding J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(13):6055-69. PubMed ID: 27288444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The next generation of transcription factor binding site prediction.
Mathelier A; Wasserman WW
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(9):e1003214. PubMed ID: 24039567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated incorporation of pairwise dependency in transcription factor binding site prediction using dinucleotide weight tensors.
Omidi S; Zavolan M; Pachkov M; Breda J; Berger S; van Nimwegen E
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005176. PubMed ID: 28753602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MODER2: first-order Markov modeling and discovery of monomeric and dimeric binding motifs.
Toivonen J; Das PK; Taipale J; Ukkonen E
Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(9):2690-2696. PubMed ID: 31999322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. COPS: detecting co-occurrence and spatial arrangement of transcription factor binding motifs in genome-wide datasets.
Ha N; Polychronidou M; Lohmann I
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52055. PubMed ID: 23272209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BEESEM: estimation of binding energy models using HT-SELEX data.
Ruan S; Swamidass SJ; Stormo GD
Bioinformatics; 2017 Aug; 33(15):2288-2295. PubMed ID: 28379348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motif models proposing independent and interdependent impacts of nucleotides are related to high and low affinity transcription factor binding sites in Arabidopsis.
Tsukanov AV; Mironova VV; Levitsky VG
Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():938545. PubMed ID: 35968123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data.
Bailey TL
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1653-9. PubMed ID: 21543442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modular discovery of monomeric and dimeric transcription factor binding motifs for large data sets.
Toivonen J; Kivioja T; Jolma A; Yin Y; Taipale J; Ukkonen E
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 May; 46(8):e44. PubMed ID: 29385521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asymmetric Conservation within Pairs of Co-Occurred Motifs Mediates Weak Direct Binding of Transcription Factors in ChIP-Seq Data.
Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Zemlyanskaya E; Merkulova T
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32825662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimally choosing PWM motif databases and sequence scanning approaches based on ChIP-seq data.
Dabrowski M; Dojer N; Krystkowiak I; Kaminska B; Wilczynski B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():140. PubMed ID: 25927199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative analysis of transcription factor binding models learned from PBM, HT-SELEX and ChIP data.
Orenstein Y; Shamir R
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Apr; 42(8):e63. PubMed ID: 24500199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. W-AlignACE: an improved Gibbs sampling algorithm based on more accurate position weight matrices learned from sequence and gene expression/ChIP-chip data.
Chen X; Guo L; Fan Z; Jiang T
Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1121-8. PubMed ID: 18325926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of topic models to a compendium of ChIP-Seq datasets uncovers recurrent transcriptional regulatory modules.
Yang G; Ma A; Qin ZS; Chen L
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2352-2358. PubMed ID: 31899481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets.
Machanick P; Bailey TL
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 21486936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inferring intra-motif dependencies of DNA binding sites from ChIP-seq data.
Eggeling R; Roos T; Myllymäki P; Grosse I
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():375. PubMed ID: 26552868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
