151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33928520)
1. Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory.
Wu Q; Vanerum M; Agten A; Christiansen A; Vandenabeele F; Rigo JM; Janssen R
Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):518-543. PubMed ID: 33928520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analyzing Test-Taking Behavior: Decision Theory Meets Psychometric Theory.
Budescu DV; Bo Y
Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1105-22. PubMed ID: 25142256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
Luetsch K; Burrows J
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Students' certainty during course test-taking and performance on clerkships and board exams.
Zeleznik C; Hojat M; Goepp CE; Amadio P; Kowlessar OD; Borenstein B
J Med Educ; 1988 Dec; 63(12):881-91. PubMed ID: 3199416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey.
; Simianu VV; Grounds MA; Joslyn SL; LeClerc JE; Ehlers AP; Agrawal N; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Flaxman AD; Flum DR
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):153. PubMed ID: 27905926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments.
Tweed MJ; Stein S; Wilkinson TJ; Purdie G; Smith J
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 17(1):106. PubMed ID: 28659125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Considering evidence for ethnicity bias using assessment case scenarios and medical student correctness and certainty.
Tweed M; Purdie G; Lacey C
N Z Med J; 2019 Mar; 132(1491):71-77. PubMed ID: 30845130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Reliability and Medical Students' Appreciation of Certainty-Based Marking.
Smrkolj Š; Bančov E; Smrkolj V
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of certainty-based marking in a second-year medical student cohort: a pilot study.
Schoendorfer N; Emmett D
Adv Med Educ Pract; 2012; 3():139-43. PubMed ID: 23762012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self-monitoring develop through a medical course.
Tweed M; Willink R; Wilkinson TJ
Med Educ; 2024 May; 58(5):535-543. PubMed ID: 37932950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.
Chae YM; Park SG; Park I
Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30852856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining and tracking medical student self-monitoring using multiple-choice question item certainty.
Tweed M; Purdie G; Wilkinson T
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):344. PubMed ID: 33023565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Content Validity and Psychometric Characteristics of the "Knowledge about Older Patients Quiz" for Nurses Using Item Response Theory.
Dikken J; Hoogerduijn JG; Kruitwagen C; Schuurmans MJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Nov; 64(11):2378-2383. PubMed ID: 27627575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.
Sam AH; Westacott R; Gurnell M; Wilson R; Meeran K; Brown C
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e032550. PubMed ID: 31558462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
Downing SM
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
De Champlain AF
Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.
Raymond MR; Stevens C; Bucak SD
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 30362027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
