These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33928520)

  • 21. The psychometric properties of five scoring methods applied to the script concordance test.
    Bland AC; Kreiter CD; Gordon JA
    Acad Med; 2005 Apr; 80(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15793026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options.
    Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Clauser BE
    Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S52-5. PubMed ID: 17001136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing communication skills during OSCE: need for integrated psychometric approaches.
    Piumatti G; Cerutti B; Perron NJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Feb; 21(1):106. PubMed ID: 33593345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of long-menu and single-best-answer multiple choice questions in computer-based summative assessments: a randomised controlled trial.
    Cerutti B; Stollar F; Escher M; Blondon K; Aujesky S; Nendaz M; Galetto-Lacour A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):219. PubMed ID: 31215430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is there ever a single best answer (SBA): assessment driving certainty in the uncertain world of GP?
    Gardner NP; Gormley GJ; Kearney GP
    Educ Prim Care; 2023 Jul; 34(4):180-183. PubMed ID: 37642400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes.
    Hellinger FJ
    Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 2927183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Kang SY; Kim KS; Kim GH; Choi YH; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():20. PubMed ID: 28900070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.
    van der Maas HLJ; Molenaar D; Maris G; Kievit RA; Borsboom D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):339-356. PubMed ID: 21401290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Disruptive Analysis of Closed Questions Assessments at Medical School, Interest of Massive Multi-Choice Tests.
    Fourcot M; Di Marco L; Leungo V; Gillois P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1927-1928. PubMed ID: 31438411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of Multiple True or False Options with Negative Scoring Schemes Against Single Best of Five Answer Options in a Medical School.
    Anyabolu EN; Chukwuonye II; Okoye IC; Ufoaroh CU; Anyabolu AE; Dike KC
    West Afr J Med; 2020 Dec; 37(7):819-824. PubMed ID: 33296494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychometric analysis of performance on categories of client needs and nursing process with the NLN Diagnostic Readiness Test.
    Dimitrov DM; Shelestak D
    J Nurs Meas; 2003; 11(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 15633777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: a psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.
    Bradshaw L; Templin J
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jul; 79(3):403-25. PubMed ID: 25205005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Formative and Summative Assessment in Veterinary Pathology and Other Courses at a Mexican Veterinary College.
    Valero G; Cárdenas P
    J Vet Med Educ; 2017; 44(2):331-337. PubMed ID: 27779920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Liner programming method to construct equated item sets for implementation of periodical computer-based testing of Korean medical licensing examination.
    Seo DG; Kim MG; Kim NH; Shin HS; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():26. PubMed ID: 30336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal Item Calibration for Computerized Achievement Tests.
    Ul Hassan M; Miller F
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1101-1128. PubMed ID: 31183669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.