These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33928520)

  • 41. Evaluation of medical students in radiology. Written testing using uncued multiple-choice questions.
    Fajardo LL; Chan KM
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 8262753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Very short answer questions: a viable alternative to multiple choice questions.
    Puthiaparampil T; Rahman MM
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):141. PubMed ID: 32375739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Item pre-knowledge true prevalence in clinical anatomy - application of gated item response theory model.
    Severo M; Silva-Pereira F; Ferreira MA; Monteiro M; Pereira I
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jul; 19(1):284. PubMed ID: 31345201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making.
    Lee DG; Hare TA
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):503-521. PubMed ID: 36631708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Usable knowledge, hazardous ignorance - beyond the percentage correct score.
    Dory V; Degryse J; Roex A; Vanpee D
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 20423255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Three Psychometric-Model-Based Option-Scored Multiple Choice Item Design Principles that Enhance Instruction by Improving Quiz Diagnostic Classification of Knowledge Attributes.
    Stout W; Henson R; DiBello L
    Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1299-1333. PubMed ID: 36513869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lucky guess or knowledge: a cross-sectional study using the Bland and Altman analysis to compare confidence-based testing of pharmacological knowledge in 3rd and 5th year medical students.
    Kampmeyer D; Matthes J; Herzig S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 25103688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perceptual accuracy and conflicting effects of certainty on risk-taking behaviour.
    Shafir S; Reich T; Tsur E; Erev I; Lotem A
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):917-20. PubMed ID: 18548069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evidence-based decision about test scoring rules in clinical anatomy multiple-choice examinations.
    Severo M; Gaio AR; Povo A; Silva-Pereira F; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 25053378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Psychometric Properties and Calibration of the SPOREEM (Students' Perception of the Operating Room Educational Environment Measure).
    Klemmt C; Backhaus J; Jeske D; Koenig S
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 33168469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of formula and number-right scoring in undergraduate medical training: a Rasch model analysis.
    Cecilio-Fernandes D; Medema H; Collares CF; Schuwirth L; Cohen-Schotanus J; Tio RA
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):192. PubMed ID: 29121888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Undergraduate nursing students' pharmacology knowledge and risk of error estimate.
    Caboral-Stevens M; Ignacio RV; Newberry G
    Nurse Educ Today; 2020 Oct; 93():104540. PubMed ID: 32721649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Response pattern of depressive symptoms among college students: What lies behind items of the Beck Depression Inventory-II?
    de Sá Junior AR; de Andrade AG; Andrade LH; Gorenstein C; Wang YP
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Jul; 234():124-130. PubMed ID: 29525353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
    Lee H; Smith WZ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of cueing on written examinations of clinical decision making: a case study.
    Desjardins I; Touchie C; Pugh D; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 48(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 24528460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of Multiple-Select Multiple-Choice Items in a Dental Undergraduate Curriculum: Retrospective Study Involving the Application of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow P; Schmidt D; Herrmann M; Wassmann T; Wiegand A; Raupach T
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Mar; 9():e43792. PubMed ID: 36841970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How sure can we be that a student really failed? On the measurement precision of individual pass-fail decisions from the perspective of Item Response Theory.
    Schauber SK; Hecht M
    Med Teach; 2020 Dec; 42(12):1374-1384. PubMed ID: 32857621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Using item response theory to appraise key feature examinations for clinical reasoning.
    Zegota S; Becker T; Hagmayer Y; Raupach T
    Med Teach; 2022 Nov; 44(11):1253-1259. PubMed ID: 35653617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Statistical item analysis of the examination in anesthesiology for medical students using the Rasch model.
    Yang SC; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang KY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2011 Mar; 74(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 21421207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.