211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33928924)
1. Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss.
Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Swanepoel W; Moore DR
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):565-573. PubMed ID: 33928924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.
Zadeh LM; Brennan V; Swanepoel W; Lin L; Moore DR
medRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35821983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise.
Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Sternasty K; Swanepoel W; Hunter LL; Moore DR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Nov; 116(47):23753-23759. PubMed ID: 31685611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss.
Vlaming MS; MacKinnon RC; Jansen M; Moore DR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):667-79. PubMed ID: 25127323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extended High-frequency Hearing Impairment Despite a Normal Audiogram: Relation to Early Aging, Speech-in-noise Perception, Cochlear Function, and Routine Earphone Use.
Mishra SK; Saxena U; Rodrigo H
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):822-835. PubMed ID: 34700326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech Recognition in Noise Using Binaural Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise in Children: Maturation and Self-Test Validity.
Wolmarans J; De Sousa KC; Frisby C; Mahomed-Asmail F; Smits C; Moore DR; Swanepoel W
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 May; 32(5):315-323. PubMed ID: 34375996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the Digits-In-Noise Test to Estimate Age-Related Hearing Loss.
Koole A; Nagtegaal AP; Homans NC; Hofman A; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Goedegebure A
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 26871876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian.
Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Sternasty K; Moore DR
Int J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 32903129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Importance of Extended High-Frequency Speech Information in the Recognition of Digits, Words, and Sentences in Quiet and Noise.
Polspoel S; Kramer SE; van Dijk B; Smits C
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):913-920. PubMed ID: 34772838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the Efficiency of the Digits-in-Noise Hearing Screening Test: A Comparison Between Four Different Test Procedures.
Dambha T; Swanepoel W; Mahomed-Asmail F; De Sousa KC; Graham MA; Smits C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):378-391. PubMed ID: 34890245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.
De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 34799493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
