446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33928926)
1. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of sentence context on speech perception in young and older adults.
Hutchinson KM
J Gerontol; 1989 Mar; 44(2):P36-44. PubMed ID: 2921474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Age on Informational Masking: Differential Effects of Phonetic and Semantic Information in the Masker.
Jagadeesh AB; Uppunda AK
Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):707-718. PubMed ID: 35926084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.
Sommers MS; Kirk KI; Pisoni DB
Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9099558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.
Van Engen KJ; Bradlow AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):519-26. PubMed ID: 17297805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise.
Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 34965362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
