158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33929269)
1. Economic and clinical outcomes of pegfilgrastim via prefilled syringe vs on-body injector: a real-world data analysis.
McBride A; Campbell K; Li E; Schroader B; Campbell D; Wang W
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Sep; 27(9):1230-1238. PubMed ID: 33929269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized, Open-Label Study Conducted to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Pegfilgrastim-cbqv On-Body Injector Versus Prefilled Syringe in Healthy Male Participants.
Tang H; Civoli F; Tatarewicz S; Vandenkoornhuyse N; Finck B
Adv Ther; 2024 Mar; 41(3):991-1009. PubMed ID: 38180721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McBride A; Krendyukov A; Mathieson N; Campbell K; Balu S; Natek M; MacDonald K; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 31433700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Filgrastim Versus a Filgrastim Biosimilar and Febrile Neutropenia-Associated Costs Among Patients with Nonmyeloid Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.
Schwartzberg LS; Lal LS; Balu S; Campbell K; Brekke L; DeLeon A; Elliott C; Korrer S
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Oct; 24(10):976-984. PubMed ID: 29687743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conversion to supportive care with biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv enables budget-neutral expanded access to R-CHOP treatment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
McBride A; MacDonald K; Abraham I
Leuk Res; 2021 Jul; 106():106591. PubMed ID: 33957339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
McBride A; Campbell K; Bikkina M; MacDonald K; Abraham I; Balu S
J Med Econ; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 28722494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis.
Mahtani RL; Belani R; Crawford J; Dale D; DeCosta L; Gawade PL; Huynh C; Lawrence T; Lewis S; MacLaughlin WW; Narang M; Rifkin R
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6135-6144. PubMed ID: 35426046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conversion from pegfilgrastim with on-body injector to pegfilgrastim-jmdb: cost-efficiency analysis and budget-neutral expanded access to prophylaxis and treatment.
McBride A; MacDonald K; Fuentes-Alburo A; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):598-606. PubMed ID: 33866947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.
Metz M; Semsek D; Rogmans G; Hutzschenreuter U; Fietz T; Harde J; Zacharias S; Hielscher C; Lorenz A; Zahn MO; Guth D; Liebers S; Berghorn M; Grebhardt S; Matillon CD; Egerer G; Potthoff K
Support Care Cancer; 2021 Nov; 29(11):6633-6643. PubMed ID: 33956213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Administration options for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: patient and physician preferences from a cross-sectional survey.
Brett Hauber A; Mange B; Price MA; Wolin D; Bensink M; Kaye JA; Chandler D
Support Care Cancer; 2018 Jan; 26(1):251-260. PubMed ID: 28785862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Gawade PL; Li S; Henry D; Smith N; Belani R; Kelsh MA; Bradbury BD
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Sep; 28(9):4413-4424. PubMed ID: 31919669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient out-of-pocket and payer costs for pegfilgrastim originator vs biosimilars as primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle among a commercially insured population.
Wang CY; Park H; Heldermon CD; Vouri SM; Brown JD
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2022 Jul; 28(7):795-802. PubMed ID: 35737859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.
Weycker D; Doroff R; Hanau A; Bowers C; Belani R; Chandler D; Lonshteyn A; Bensink M; Lyman GH
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):792. PubMed ID: 31399079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-efficiency and expanded access of prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia: economic simulation analysis for the US of conversion from reference pegfilgrastim to biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv.
MacDonald K; McBride A; Alrawashdh N; Abraham I
J Med Econ; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1466-1476. PubMed ID: 33023360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015.
Weycker D; Bensink M; Lonshteyn A; Doroff R; Chandler D
Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2107-2113. PubMed ID: 28958157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
