These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33929635)

  • 1. Fractal dimension analysis as an easy computational approach to improve breast cancer histopathological diagnosis.
    da Silva LG; da Silva Monteiro WRS; de Aguiar Moreira TM; Rabelo MAE; de Assis EACP; de Souza GT
    Appl Microsc; 2021 Apr; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 33929635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic prediction of tumour malignancy in breast cancer with fractal dimension.
    Chan A; Tuszynski JA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2016 Dec; 3(12):160558. PubMed ID: 28083100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of MR images of breast masses with fractal-interpolation function models.
    Penn AI; Bolinger L; Schnall MD; Loew MH
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 10898034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractal dimension in aspiration cytology smears of breast and cervical lesions.
    Ohri S; Dey P; Nijhawan R
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15131899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scale-specific multifractal medical image analysis.
    Braverman B; Tambasco M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():262931. PubMed ID: 24023588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying the architectural complexity of microscopic images of histology specimens.
    Tambasco M; Costello BM; Kouznetsov A; Yau A; Magliocco AM
    Micron; 2009 Jun; 40(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19171487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cell type classifiers for breast cancer microscopic images based on fractal dimension texture analysis of image color layers.
    Jitaree S; Phinyomark A; Boonyaphiphat P; Phukpattaranont P
    Scanning; 2015; 37(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 25689353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of breast ultrasound images using fractal feature.
    Chen DR; Chang RF; Chen CJ; Ho MF; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Hung SJ; Moon WK
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15967313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A gamma-gaussian mixture model for detection of mitotic cells in breast cancer histopathology images.
    Khan AM; Eldaly H; Rajpoot NM
    J Pathol Inform; 2013; 4():11. PubMed ID: 23858386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fractal analysis for classification of breast carcinoma in optical coherence tomography.
    Sullivan AC; Hunt JP; Oldenburg AL
    J Biomed Opt; 2011 Jun; 16(6):066010. PubMed ID: 21721811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractal-based analysis of optical coherence tomography data to quantify retinal tissue damage.
    Somfai GM; Tátrai E; Laurik L; Varga BE; Ölvedy V; Smiddy WE; Tchitnga R; Somogyi A; DeBuc DC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 15(1):295. PubMed ID: 25178846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI Image Processing Based on Fractal Analysis.
    Marusina MY; Mochalina AP; Frolova EP; Satikov VI; Barchuk AA; Kuznetcov VI; Gaidukov VS; Tarakanov SA
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Jan; 18(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 28240009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer Aided Diagnosis for Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Advanced Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.
    Ştefănescu D; Streba C; Cârţână ET; Săftoiu A; Gruionu G; Gruionu LG
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154863. PubMed ID: 27144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring fractal dimensions. Sensitivity to edge-processing functions.
    Cross SS; Cotton DW; Underwood JC
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1994 Oct; 16(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 7840842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between tumor grade and computed architectural complexity in breast cancer specimens.
    Tambasco M; Magliocco AM
    Hum Pathol; 2008 May; 39(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 18439940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Goodness-of-fit of the Fractal Dimension as a Diagnostic Factor in Breast Cancer.
    Maipas S; Nonni A; Politi E; Sarlanis H; Kavantzas NG
    Cureus; 2018 Nov; 10(11):e3630. PubMed ID: 30705789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.