BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33929784)

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017 Versus Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Kim YY; Lee S; Shin J; Son WJ; Shin H; Lee JE; Hwang JA; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1912-1919. PubMed ID: 33929784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Performance of the 2018 EASL vs. LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Roh YH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 58(6):1942-1950. PubMed ID: 37010244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LI-RADS Major Features on MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Aug; 54(2):518-525. PubMed ID: 33638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
    Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Hwang SH; Roh YH; Chung YE; Choi JY
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1199-1206. PubMed ID: 32640250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Kim YY; Lee S; Shin J; Son WJ; Roh YH; Hwang JA; Lee JE
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6723-6729. PubMed ID: 35849177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Roh YH; Choi JY; Chernyak V; Sirlin CB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; 34(3):1502-1514. PubMed ID: 37656177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Liang Y; Xu F; Guo Y; Lai L; Jiang X; Wei X; Wu H; Wang J
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109404. PubMed ID: 33276248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Bae H; Chung YE; Choi JY; Huh YM; Park MS
    Liver Int; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2345-2352. PubMed ID: 32722894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS v2018 versus KLCA-NCC 2018 Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Hepatobiliary Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Son WJ; Roh YH; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    Gut Liver; 2023 May; 17(3):466-474. PubMed ID: 36317516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.
    van der Pol CB; Lim CS; Sirlin CB; McGrath TA; Salameh JP; Bashir MR; Tang A; Singal AG; Costa AF; Fowler K; McInnes MDF
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Mar; 156(4):976-986. PubMed ID: 30445016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI-diagnosis of category LR-M observations in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Hwang JA; Lee JE; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3319-3326. PubMed ID: 35031839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
    Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Son JH; Choi SH; Kim SY; Lee SJ; Park SH; Kim KW; Won HJ; Shin YM; Kim PN
    Hepatol Int; 2020 Dec; 14(6):1104-1113. PubMed ID: 33170416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Huang JY; Li JW; Lu Q; Luo Y; Lin L; Shi YJ; Li T; Liu JB; Lyshchik A
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 31793849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR versus CEUS LI-RADS for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients.
    Huang Z; Zhou P; Li S; Li K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 May; 47(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 33610338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Son WJ; Roh YH; Choi JY; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
    Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220646. PubMed ID: 36625748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Chang DR; Kim H; Kim MJ
    Clin Mol Hepatol; 2020 Jul; 26(3):340-351. PubMed ID: 32492765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi SH; Kim B; Choi JI; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4785-4793. PubMed ID: 33409795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.