These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33929784)

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2017 Versus Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Kim YY; Lee S; Shin J; Son WJ; Shin H; Lee JE; Hwang JA; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1912-1919. PubMed ID: 33929784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Performance of the 2018 EASL vs. LI-RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Roh YH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 58(6):1942-1950. PubMed ID: 37010244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LI-RADS Major Features on MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Aug; 54(2):518-525. PubMed ID: 33638582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
    Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Hwang SH; Roh YH; Chung YE; Choi JY
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1199-1206. PubMed ID: 32640250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Kim YY; Lee S; Shin J; Son WJ; Roh YH; Hwang JA; Lee JE
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6723-6729. PubMed ID: 35849177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Roh YH; Choi JY; Chernyak V; Sirlin CB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Mar; 34(3):1502-1514. PubMed ID: 37656177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Liang Y; Xu F; Guo Y; Lai L; Jiang X; Wei X; Wu H; Wang J
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109404. PubMed ID: 33276248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Bae H; Chung YE; Choi JY; Huh YM; Park MS
    Liver Int; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2345-2352. PubMed ID: 32722894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS v2018 versus KLCA-NCC 2018 Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Hepatobiliary Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Shin J; Lee S; Yoon JK; Son WJ; Roh YH; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    Gut Liver; 2023 May; 17(3):466-474. PubMed ID: 36317516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.
    van der Pol CB; Lim CS; Sirlin CB; McGrath TA; Salameh JP; Bashir MR; Tang A; Singal AG; Costa AF; Fowler K; McInnes MDF
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Mar; 156(4):976-986. PubMed ID: 30445016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI-diagnosis of category LR-M observations in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shin J; Lee S; Hwang JA; Lee JE; Chung YE; Choi JY; Park MS
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3319-3326. PubMed ID: 35031839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
    Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Son JH; Choi SH; Kim SY; Lee SJ; Park SH; Kim KW; Won HJ; Shin YM; Kim PN
    Hepatol Int; 2020 Dec; 14(6):1104-1113. PubMed ID: 33170416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Huang JY; Li JW; Lu Q; Luo Y; Lin L; Shi YJ; Li T; Liu JB; Lyshchik A
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 31793849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR versus CEUS LI-RADS for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from other Hepatic Malignancies in High-Risk Patients.
    Huang Z; Zhou P; Li S; Li K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 May; 47(5):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 33610338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim YY; Shin J; Son WJ; Roh YH; Choi JY; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
    Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(1):e220646. PubMed ID: 36625748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Chang DR; Kim H; Kim MJ
    Clin Mol Hepatol; 2020 Jul; 26(3):340-351. PubMed ID: 32492765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi SH; Kim B; Choi JI; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4785-4793. PubMed ID: 33409795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.