These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33930187)

  • 1. Induction of labor using Foley catheter with weight attached versus without weight attached: A randomized control trial.
    Cherian AG; Marcus TA; Sebastian T; Rathore S; Mathews JE
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 157(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 33930187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yogamoorthy U; Saaid R; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101158. PubMed ID: 37734661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
    Gagnon J; Corlin T; Berghella V; Hoffman MK; Sciscione A; Marie PS; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study.
    Solt I; Frank Wolf M; Ben-Haroush S; Kaminskyi S; Ophir E; Bornstein J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(7):1034-1041. PubMed ID: 31185762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial.
    Sulaiman S; Sivaranjani S; Razali N; Lim BK; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 160(3):814-822. PubMed ID: 35869955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial.
    Vallikkannu N; Laboh N; Tan PC; Hong JGS; Hamdan M; Lim BK
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 306(4):1027-1036. PubMed ID: 34999923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tension compared to no tension on a Foley transcervical catheter for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Fruhman G; Gavard JA; Amon E; Flick KV; Miller C; Gross GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):67.e1-67.e9. PubMed ID: 27640940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mifepristone versus balloon catheter for labor induction: a cohort study.
    Radzinsky VE; Startseva NM; Doronina OK; Teplov KV; Borisova AV
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9331-9335. PubMed ID: 35086412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjunctive membrane sweeping in Foley catheter induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial.
    Hong JGS; Magalingam VD; Sethi N; Ng DSW; Lim RCS; Tan PC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jan; 160(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 35245946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Traction vs no traction in Foley catheter use for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Schoen CN; Saccone G; Berghella V; Baker EG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jul; 4(4):100610. PubMed ID: 35257939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez Slagle HB; Fonge YN; Caplan R; Pfeuti CK; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 226(5):724.e1-724.e9. PubMed ID: 35135684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chia HM; Tan PC; Tan SP; Hamdan M; Omar SZ
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 May; 20(1):330. PubMed ID: 32471369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two different regimens of outpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial.
    Hong J; Raghavan S; Siti Nordiana A; Saaid R; Vallikkannu N; Tan PC
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 165(1):265-274. PubMed ID: 37846154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of cesarean delivery for fetal heart rate abnormalities in hypertensive pregnancies induced with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
    Londero AP; Fichera A; Orabona R; Cagnacci A; Prefumo F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):373-380. PubMed ID: 38234165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.