These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33930538)

  • 1. Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA.
    Schliephake LM; Trempler I; Roehe MA; Heins N; Schubotz RI
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 236():118028. PubMed ID: 33930538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The encoding of category-specific versus nonspecific information in human inferior temporal cortex.
    Guo B; Meng M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 116():240-7. PubMed ID: 25869859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction-error signals to violated expectations about person identity and head orientation are doubly-dissociated across dorsal and ventral visual stream regions.
    Robinson JE; Woods W; Leung S; Kaufman J; Breakspear M; Young AW; Johnston PJ
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 206():116325. PubMed ID: 31682984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selectivity for mid-level properties of faces and places in the fusiform face area and parahippocampal place area.
    Coggan DD; Baker DH; Andrews TJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 49(12):1587-1596. PubMed ID: 30589482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Category expectation modulates baseline and stimulus-evoked activity in human inferotemporal cortex.
    Puri AM; Wojciulik E; Ranganath C
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1301():89-99. PubMed ID: 19747463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulation of brain activity in the fusiform face and parahippocampal place areas in 7-11-year-old children.
    Vuontela V; Jiang P; Tokariev M; Savolainen P; Ma Y; Aronen ET; Fontell T; Liiri T; Ahlström M; Salonen O; Carlson S
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 23262175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural representation of geometry and surface properties in object and scene perception.
    Lowe MX; Rajsic J; Gallivan JP; Ferber S; Cant JS
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():586-597. PubMed ID: 28647484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extrastriate cortex and medial temporal lobe regions respond differentially to visual feature overlap within preferred stimulus category.
    Mundy ME; Downing PE; Graham KS
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3053-61. PubMed ID: 22820343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dynamic contribution of the high-level visual cortex to imagery and perception.
    Boccia M; Sulpizio V; Teghil A; Palermo L; Piccardi L; Galati G; Guariglia C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Jun; 40(8):2449-2463. PubMed ID: 30702203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Positive and Negative Expectations on Human Pain Perception Engage Separate But Interrelated and Dependently Regulated Cerebral Mechanisms.
    Shih YW; Tsai HY; Lin FS; Lin YH; Chiang CY; Lu ZL; Tseng MT
    J Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 39(7):1261-1274. PubMed ID: 30552181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linearity of the fMRI response in category-selective regions of human visual cortex.
    Horner AJ; Andrews TJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Aug; 30(8):2628-40. PubMed ID: 19107750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain.
    Jiang J; Summerfield C; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 33(47):18438-47. PubMed ID: 24259568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conjoint representation of texture ensemble and location in the parahippocampal place area.
    Park J; Park S
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr; 117(4):1595-1607. PubMed ID: 28123006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural interaction of the amygdala with the prefrontal and temporal cortices in the processing of facial expressions as revealed by fMRI.
    Iidaka T; Omori M; Murata T; Kosaka H; Yonekura Y; Okada T; Sadato N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 13(8):1035-47. PubMed ID: 11784442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal expectations modulate face image repetition suppression of early stimulus evoked event-related potentials.
    Feuerriegel D; Churches O; Coussens S; Keage HAD
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jan; 122():76-87. PubMed ID: 30468778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual face- and house-related eye movement patterns distinctively activate FFA and PPA.
    Wang L; Baumgartner F; Kaule FR; Hanke M; Pollmann S
    Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5532. PubMed ID: 31797874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct medial temporal networks encode surprise during motivation by reward versus punishment.
    Murty VP; LaBar KS; Adcock RA
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Oct; 134 Pt A(Pt A):55-64. PubMed ID: 26854903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural coding of face and body orientation in occipitotemporal cortex.
    Foster C; Zhao M; Bolkart T; Black MJ; Bartels A; Bülthoff I
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 246():118783. PubMed ID: 34879251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional modulation of background connectivity between ventral visual cortex and the medial temporal lobe.
    Córdova NI; Tompary A; Turk-Browne NB
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Oct; 134 Pt A(Pt A):115-122. PubMed ID: 27321163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction error processing and sharpening of expected information across the face-processing hierarchy.
    Garlichs A; Blank H
    Nat Commun; 2024 Apr; 15(1):3407. PubMed ID: 38649694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.