These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33930684)

  • 1. Sustainable collection center location selection in emerging economy for electronic waste with fuzzy Best-Worst and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Sagnak M; Berberoglu Y; Memis İ; Yazgan O
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 127():37-47. PubMed ID: 33930684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating critical barriers and pathways to implementation of e-waste formalization management systems in Ghana: a hybrid BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS approach.
    Chen D; Faibil D; Agyemang M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(35):44561-44584. PubMed ID: 32772292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
    Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional Water Resources Security Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Method.
    Tu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32664379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An integrated fuzzy sustainable supplier evaluation and selection framework for green supply chains in reverse logistics.
    Tavana M; Shaabani A; Santos-Arteaga FJ; Valaei N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53953-53982. PubMed ID: 34043173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fuzzy AHP approach for prioritizing electronic waste management options: a case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Khoshand A; Rahimi K; Ehteshami M; Gharaei S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(10):9649-9660. PubMed ID: 30729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the sustainability of big data centers using the analytic network process and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Zhang Q; Yang S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17913-17927. PubMed ID: 33410015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating and prioritizing the healthcare waste disposal center locations using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method.
    Beheshtinia MA; Bahrami F; Fathi M; Asadi S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15130. PubMed ID: 37704751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
    Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: a case study of Malaysian Palm oil industry.
    Fallahpour A; Nayeri S; Sheikhalishahi M; Wong KY; Tian G; Fathollahi-Fard AM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jan; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 33506420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and Selection of HazMat Transportation Alternatives: A PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-Integrated Multi-Perspective Approach.
    Chen ZS; Li M; Kong WT; Chin KS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 31731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology.
    Pamucar D; Ecer F; Deveci M
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 788():147763. PubMed ID: 34029824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of remedial options for a benzene-contaminated site through a simulation-based fuzzy-MCDA approach.
    Yang AL; Huang GH; Qin XS; Fan YR
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Apr; 213-214():421-33. PubMed ID: 22390955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study.
    Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supporting mobile WEEE collection on demand: A method for multi-criteria vehicle routing, loading and cost optimisation.
    Nowakowski P; Król A; Mrówczyńska B
    Waste Manag; 2017 Nov; 69():377-392. PubMed ID: 28784296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing A Sustainable Urban-Environmental Quality Evaluation System in China Based on A Hybrid Model.
    Shao Q; Weng SS; Liou JJH; Lo HW; Jiang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 31013666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste.
    Ekmekçioğlu M; Kaya T; Kahraman C
    Waste Manag; 2010; 30(8-9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 20303733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.