BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33931016)

  • 1. Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort.
    Vijayram R; Damaraju N; Xavier A; Desiraju BK; Thiruvengadam R; Misra S; Chopra S; Khurana A; Wadhwa N; ; Rengaswamy R; Sinha H; Bhatnagar S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Apr; 21(1):343. PubMed ID: 33931016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
    Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of various dating formulae on sonographic estimation of gestational age in extremely preterm infants.
    Simic M; Amer-Wåhlin I; Maršál K; Källén K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 21953817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gestational length assignment based on last menstrual period, first trimester crown-rump length, ovulation, and implantation timing.
    Mahendru AA; Wilhelm-Benartzi CS; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM; Johnson S; Lees C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 294(4):867-76. PubMed ID: 27469987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the date of last menstrual period be trusted in the first trimester? Comparisons of gestational age measures from a prospective cohort study in six low-income to middle-income countries.
    Patel A; Bann CM; Thorsten VR; Rao SR; Lokangaka A; Tshefu Kitoto A; Bauserman M; Figueroa L; Krebs NF; Esamai F; Bucher S; Saleem S; Goldenberg RL; Chomba E; Carlo WA; Goudar S; Derman R; Koso-Thomas M; McClure E; Hibberd PL
    BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e067470. PubMed ID: 37730415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy.
    Papageorghiou AT; Kennedy SH; Salomon LJ; Ohuma EO; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Altman DG; Purwar M; Noble JA; Pang R; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 44(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 25044000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First-trimester screening in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: significance of gestational dating by oocyte retrieval or sonographic measurement of crown-rump length.
    Gjerris AC; Loft A; Pinborg A; Tabor A; Christiansen M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 18816495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning.
    Rittenhouse KJ; Vwalika B; Keil A; Winston J; Stoner M; Price JT; Kapasa M; Mubambe M; Banda V; Muunga W; Stringer JSA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0198919. PubMed ID: 30811399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of gestational age in early pregnancy from crown-rump length when gestational age range is truncated: the case study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
    Ohuma EO; Papageorghiou AT; Villar J; Altman DG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Dec; 13():151. PubMed ID: 24314232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First trimester dating by fetal heart rate assessment: a comparison with crown-rump length measurement.
    Obican SG; Khodak-Gelman S; Elmi A; Larsen JW; Friedman AM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 24635416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of late pregnancy biometry for gestational age dating in low-income and middle-income countries: a prospective, multicountry, population-based cohort study from the WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) Study Group.
    WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement Late Pregnancy Dating Study Group
    Lancet Glob Health; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e545-e554. PubMed ID: 32199122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of standardization in determining gestational age for prenatal screening.
    Koster MP; Van Leeuwen-Spruijt M; Wortelboer EJ; Stoutenbeek P; Elvers LH; Loeber JG; Visser GH; Schielen PC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 18720453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
    Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester.
    Hoffman CS; Messer LC; Mendola P; Savitz DA; Herring AH; Hartmann KE
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 22(6):587-96. PubMed ID: 19000297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
    Sazawal S; Ryckman KK; Das S; Khanam R; Nisar I; Jasper E; Dutta A; Rahman S; Mehmood U; Bedell B; Deb S; Chowdhury NH; Barkat A; Mittal H; Ahmed S; Khalid F; Raqib R; Manu A; Yoshida S; Ilyas M; Nizar A; Ali SM; Baqui AH; Jehan F; Dhingra U; Bahl R
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Sep; 21(1):609. PubMed ID: 34493237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
    Wessel H; Nyberg T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Von Düring V; Kahn JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10776011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A home calendar and recall method of last menstrual period for estimating gestational age in rural Bangladesh: a validation study.
    Gernand AD; Paul RR; Ullah B; Taher MA; Witter FR; Wu L; Labrique AB; West KP; Christian P
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2016 Oct; 35(1):34. PubMed ID: 27769295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of gestational dating methods and implications for exposure-outcome associations: an example with PM2.5 and preterm birth.
    Rappazzo KM; Lobdell DT; Messer LC; Poole C; Daniels JL
    Occup Environ Med; 2017 Feb; 74(2):138-143. PubMed ID: 27919061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.