These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33932175)
1. Investigating the Relationship between Sociodemographic Factors and Bird Identification by Landowners Across a Rural-to-Urban Gradient. Fleck MS; Dinan M; Simmons LJ; Steury TD; Lepczyk CA Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 68(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 33932175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes. Lepczyk CA; Mertig AG; Liu J Environ Manage; 2004 Jan; 33(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 14749899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships. Stroman DA; Kreuter UP J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental interactions between people and birds in semiarid lands of the Zapotitlán Valley, Central Mexico. Romero-Bautista YA; Moreno-Calles AI; Alvarado-Ramos F; Reyes Castillo M; Casas A J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2020 Jun; 16(1):32. PubMed ID: 32503563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes. Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage? Armstrong A; Stedman RC Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is Hay for the Birds? Investigating Landowner Willingness to Time Hay Harvests for Grassland Bird Conservation. Gruntorad MP; Graham KA; Arcilla N; Chizinski CJ Animals (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33916479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach. Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices. Sorice MG; Kreuter UP; Wilcox BP; Fox WE J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():144-52. PubMed ID: 24374464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context. Niemiec RM; Pech RP; Norbury GL; Byrom AE Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 59(3):477-489. PubMed ID: 28078387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Small sight-Big might: Economic impact of bird tourism shows opportunities for rural communities and biodiversity conservation. Schwoerer T; Dawson NG PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0268594. PubMed ID: 35793337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis. Batáry P; Kurucz K; Suarez-Rubio M; Chamberlain DE Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Mar; 24(3):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 29080260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Urban and rural habitats differ in number and type of bird feeders and in bird species consuming supplementary food. Tryjanowski P; Skórka P; Sparks TH; Biaduń W; Brauze T; Hetmański T; Martyka R; Indykiewicz P; Myczko Ł; Kunysz P; Kawa P; Czyż S; Czechowski P; Polakowski M; Zduniak P; Jerzak L; Janiszewski T; Goławski A; Duduś L; Nowakowski JJ; Wuczyński A; Wysocki D Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Oct; 22(19):15097-103. PubMed ID: 26003091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tradition and trade: culture and exploitation of avian fauna by a rural community surrounding protected areas in the south of Bahia's State, Northeastern Brazil. Neto AIS; Fraga RE; Schiavetti A J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2022 Mar; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 35260180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ability of land owners and their cooperatives to leverage payments greater than opportunity costs from conservation contracts. Lennox GD; Armsworth PR Conserv Biol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 23692023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado. Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The agro-enabled urban revolution, pesticides, politics, and popular culture: a case study of land use, birds, and insecticides in the USA. Brain RA; Anderson JC Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jul; 26(21):21717-21735. PubMed ID: 31129901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the effect of agricultural land abandonment on bird communities in southern-eastern Europe. Zakkak S; Radovic A; Nikolov SC; Shumka S; Kakalis L; Kati V J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():171-9. PubMed ID: 26379254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]