443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33933384)
21. Culprit Vessel Versus Multivessel Versus In-Hospital Staged Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Stratified Analyses in High-Risk Patient Groups and Anatomic Subsets of Nonculprit Disease.
Iqbal MB; Nadra IJ; Ding L; Fung A; Aymong E; Chan AW; Hodge S; Della Siega A; Robinson SD;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 28057282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization.
Mylotte D; Morice MC; Eltchaninoff H; Garot J; Louvard Y; Lefèvre T; Garot P
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 6(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 23352816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical Outcomes According to ECG Presentations in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock Trial.
Zeitouni M; Akin I; Desch S; Barthélémy O; Brugier D; Collet JP; de Waha-Thiele S; Greenwood JP; Guedeney P; Hage G; Hauguel-Moreau M; Huber K; Kerneis M; Noc M; Oldroyd KG; Piek JJ; Rouanet S; Savonitto S; Serpytis P; Silvain J; Stepinska J; Vicaut E; Vrints CJM; Windecker S; Zeymer U; Thiele H; Montalescot G;
Chest; 2021 Apr; 159(4):1415-1425. PubMed ID: 33248059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Benefit of a staged in-hospital revascularization strategy in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: Analyses by risk stratification.
Kim MC; Bae S; Ahn Y; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Kim JH; Jeong MH; Kim HS; Chae SC; Cha KS;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97(6):1151-1159. PubMed ID: 32569397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Waha S; Jobs A; Eitel I; Pöss J; Stiermaier T; Meyer-Saraei R; Fuernau G; Zeymer U; Desch S; Thiele H
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2018 Feb; 7(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 28703046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multivessel vs culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention among patients 65 years or older with acute myocardial infarction.
Wang TY; McCoy LA; Bhatt DL; Rao SV; Roe MT; Resnic FS; Cavender MA; Messenger JC; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2016 Feb; 172():9-18. PubMed ID: 26856210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.
Manari A; Varani E; Guastaroba P; Menozzi M; Valgimigli M; Menozzi A; Magnavacchi P; Franco N; Marzocchi A; Casella G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 24403174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Complete Versus Culprit only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.
Rathod KS; Koganti S; Jain AK; Rakhit R; Dalby MC; Lockie T; Kalra S; Malik IS; Knight CJ; Whitbread M; Mathur A; Firoozi S; Bogle R; Redwood S; MacCarthy PA; Sirker A; O'Mahony C; Wragg A; Jones DA
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Mar; 21(3):350-358. PubMed ID: 31327710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for Multivessel PCI Versus Culprit Artery Only PCI in STEMI Without Cardiogenic Shock.
Rai D; Tahir MW; Bandyopadhyay D; Chowdhury M; Kharsa A; Pendala VS; Ali H; Naidu SS; Baibhav B
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 46(3):100646. PubMed ID: 32650950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Percutaneous coronary intervention for nonculprit vessels in cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.
Yang JH; Hahn JY; Song PS; Song YB; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Jeong MH; Choi DJ; Kim YJ; Gwon HC
Crit Care Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 24105454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Revascularization Strategies in Patients With STEMI: Culprit-Only vs Multivessel Revascularization Using Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Alsadat N; Hyun K; D'Souza M; Chew D; Weaver J; Juergens C; Kritharides L; Hammett C; Brieger D
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 31(11):314-318. PubMed ID: 31303602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).
Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Kelbæk H; Helqvist S; Kløvgaard L; Holmvang L; Pedersen F; Jørgensen E; Saunamäki K; Clemmensen P; De Backer O; Ravkilde J; Tilsted HH; Villadsen AB; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Raungaard B; Køber L; Høfsten DE;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 28404623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term outcomes of in-hospital staged revascularization versus culprit-only intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.
Cui K; Lyu S; Song X; Liu H; Yuan F; Xu F; Zhang M; Wang W; Zhang M; Zhang D; Dai J; Tian J
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 May; 30(3):188-195. PubMed ID: 30724818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).
Pandey A; McGuire DK; de Lemos JA; Das SR; Berry JD; Brilakis ES; Banerjee S; Marso SP; Barsness GW; Simon DN; Roe M; Goyal A; Kosiborod M; Amsterdam EA; Kumbhani DJ
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2016 May; 9(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 27166210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. NSTEMI Versus STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock: Are Multivessel Interventions Better in One and Not the Other?
Gill GS; Kanmanthareddy A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 14(16):1850-1851. PubMed ID: 34412806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-Term Mortality Comparison of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Treated With Culprit-Only or Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Vergara R; Vignini E; Ciabatti M; Migliorini A; Valenti R; Antoniucci D
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 Jan; 22():10-15. PubMed ID: 32605903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Khalid MF; Khan AA; Khattak F; Ayub MT; Bagai J; Mukherjee D; Helton T; Cohen MG; Banerjee S; Paul TK
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Nov; 20(11):956-964. PubMed ID: 30638891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of stent generation on 2-year clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease who underwent culprit-only or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.
Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):E40-E55. PubMed ID: 31423723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
Kundu A; Sardar P; Kakouros N; Malhotra R; Kolte D; Feldman DN; Abbott JD; Fisher DZ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 94(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 30593731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock.
Wu J; Wang Y; Li C; Ji H; Zhao W; Tong Q; Zhang M
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():992456. PubMed ID: 36505378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
