These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33933598)

  • 1. Speech-evoked brain activity is more robust to competing speech when it is spoken by someone familiar.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118107. PubMed ID: 33933598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech spoken by familiar people is more resistant to interference by linguistically similar speech.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1465-1476. PubMed ID: 32105143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Long Does It Take for a Voice to Become Familiar? Speech Intelligibility and Voice Recognition Are Differentially Sensitive to Voice Training.
    Holmes E; To G; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 33979256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The temporal lobes differentiate between the voices of famous and unknown people: an event-related fMRI study on speaker recognition.
    Bethmann A; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47626. PubMed ID: 23112826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the roles of spectral detail and intonation contour in speech intelligibility: an FMRI study.
    Kyong JS; Scott SK; Rosen S; Howe TB; Agnew ZK; McGettigan C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1748-63. PubMed ID: 24568205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit to speech intelligibility of hearing a familiar voice.
    Domingo Y; Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):236-247. PubMed ID: 31524431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.
    Zäske R; Volberg G; Kovács G; Schweinberger SR
    J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 34(33):10821-31. PubMed ID: 25122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural dissociation in processing noise and accent in spoken language comprehension.
    Adank P; Davis MH; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jan; 50(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 22085863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct functional substrates along the right superior temporal sulcus for the processing of voices.
    Kriegstein KV; Giraud AL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):948-55. PubMed ID: 15193626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain mechanism of unfamiliar and familiar voice processing: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.
    Sun Y; Ming L; Sun J; Guo F; Li Q; Hu X
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14976. PubMed ID: 36935917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
    Madsen SMK; Dau T; Oxenham AJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249654. PubMed ID: 33826663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions.
    McGettigan C; Faulkner A; Altarelli I; Obleser J; Baverstock H; Scott SK
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):762-76. PubMed ID: 22266262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Faces and voices in the brain: A modality-general person-identity representation in superior temporal sulcus.
    Tsantani M; Kriegeskorte N; McGettigan C; Garrido L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 201():116004. PubMed ID: 31299368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.