These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3393366)

  • 41. Use of the soft silicone obstetric vacuum cup to facilitate delivery and manipulation of large pelvic masses at operation.
    Pelosi MA; Apuzzio J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 148(3):337-9. PubMed ID: 6695980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of metal and plastic cannulae for vacuum aspiration.
    Narvekar MR; Pachauri S; Mhatre V; Mandlekar A; Ananthakrishna R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1978; 15(5):433-5. PubMed ID: 28978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fetal EEG during vacuum extraction delivery with a special plastic ventouse.
    Skogsberg P; Persson A; Thalme B
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Jul; 49(1-2):200-2. PubMed ID: 6159166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Forceps verses vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1208. PubMed ID: 17127090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Forceps--use and abuse.
    Ingardia CJ; Cetrulo CL
    Clin Perinatol; 1981 Feb; 8(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 7016393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of angular traction on the performance of modern vacuum extractors.
    Vacca A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 169(3):748-9. PubMed ID: 8372894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [The vacuum extractor in the history of obstetrics].
    Heimrath T
    Arch Hist Med (Warsz); 1983; 46(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 6351791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The place of vacuum extraction in modern obstetrics].
    Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Iarŭkova N; Popivanova A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995; 34(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 7485798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A randomized study of two cups for vacuum extraction.
    Thiery M; van den Broecke R; Kermans G; Parewijck W; Dhont M; Vanlancker M; van Kets H; Defoort P; Derom R; Vanhaesebrouck P
    J Perinat Med; 1987; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 3656045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The vacuum extractor--a new obstetrical instrument for the extraction of the foetus].
    Kostić P; Zivonivić Z
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1966 Mar; 94(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 5960582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [CONTRIBUTION TO THE METHOD OF USE OF OBSTETRICAL VACUUM EXTRACTORS. A VAGAL BLOCK FOR PREVENTION OF FETAL DEPRESSIVE STATES].
    DE ALBUQUERQUE E; BIANCHI I
    Rev Clin Inst Matern Lisb; 1963; 14():49-58. PubMed ID: 14201928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Vacuum extraction deliveries.
    Newman C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):670-1. PubMed ID: 7070743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction.
    Uchil D; Arulkumaran S
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2003 Oct; 58(10):687-93. PubMed ID: 14515066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Comparative study of delivery by vacuum extraction or forceps].
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1987 Sep; 22(5):267-8, 310. PubMed ID: 3443017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Vacuum-assisted delivery: a review.
    McQuivey RW
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Sep; 16(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 15590444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Current use of vacuum extractor].
    Cueto GR; Bergeron GR
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Oct; 76(10):629-31. PubMed ID: 19062514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.