These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33934495)

  • 1. Image quality assessments according to the angle of tilt of a flex tilt coil supporting device: An ACR phantom study.
    Lee HB; Jang JS; Lee KB; Kim SM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):110-116. PubMed ID: 33934495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality assessment of a 1.5T dedicated magnetic resonance-simulator for radiotherapy with a flexible radio frequency coil setting using the standard American College of Radiology magnetic resonance imaging phantom test.
    Wong OL; Yuan J; Yu SK; Cheung KY
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2017 Apr; 7(2):205-214. PubMed ID: 28516046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.
    Hu Y; Rankine L; Green OL; Kashani R; Li HH; Li H; Nana R; Rodriguez V; Santanam L; Shvartsman S; Victoria J; Wooten HO; Dempsey JF; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5828-37. PubMed ID: 26429257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI quality assurance using the ACR phantom in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Ihalainen TM; Lönnroth NT; Peltonen JI; Uusi-Simola JK; Timonen MH; Kuusela LJ; Savolainen SE; Sipilä OE
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):966-72. PubMed ID: 21767198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a 0.35T MR system for phantom image quality stability and in vivo assessment of motion quantification.
    Saenz DL; Yan Y; Christensen N; Henzler MA; Forrest LJ; Bayouth JE; Paliwal BR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):30-40. PubMed ID: 26699552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.
    Chen CC; Wan YL; Wai YY; Liu HL
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 15692871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality comparisons of coil setups in 3T MRI for brain and head and neck radiotherapy simulations.
    Kaza E; Guenette JP; Guthier CV; Hatch S; Marques A; Singer L; Schoenfeld JD
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13794. PubMed ID: 36285814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic Analysis of ACR Phantom Images in MRI.
    Alaya IB; Mars M
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(7):892-901. PubMed ID: 33059559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of image quality for acceptance and commissioning of an MRI simulator with a semiautomatic method.
    Chen X; Dai J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):326-335. PubMed ID: 29573140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical Note: Validation of an automatic ACR phantom quality assurance tool for an MR-guided radiotherapy system.
    Gao Y; Lotey R; Low DA; Hu P; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1540-1545. PubMed ID: 33580556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of image quality and scatter and leakage radiation of an integrated MR-LINAC system.
    Wang J; Yung J; Kadbi M; Hwang K; Ding Y; Ibbott GS
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1204-1209. PubMed ID: 29363770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a New, Highly Flexible Radiofrequency Coil for MR Simulation of Patients Undergoing External Beam Radiation Therapy.
    McGee KP; Campeau NG; Witte RJ; Rossman PJ; Christopherson JA; Tryggestad EJ; Brinkmann DH; Ma DJ; Park SS; Rettmann DW; Robb FJ
    J Clin Med; 2022 Oct; 11(20):. PubMed ID: 36294304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM?
    Nelson JS; Wells JR; Baker JA; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2538. PubMed ID: 27147364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of an eight-element phased array coil in 3 Tesla MR imaging: a basic analysis.
    Hiratsuka Y; Miki H; Kikuchi K; Kiriyama I; Mochizuki T; Takahashi S; Sadamoto K
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2007; 6(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 18037798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. WE-G-217A-08: Routine ACR SNR Measurement Failed to Detect 32-Channel Head Coil Receiver Malfunction.
    Peng Q
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part28):3976. PubMed ID: 28519610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On replacing the manual measurement of ACR phantom images performed by MRI technologists with an automated measurement approach.
    Panych LP; Chiou JY; Qin L; Kimbrell VL; Bussolari L; Mulkern RV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 26395366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the quality of images for permanent magnet desktop MRI systems using specially designed phantoms.
    Qiu J; Wang G; Min J; Wang X; Wang P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(24):8677-87. PubMed ID: 24263463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast Abdominal Contrast-Enhanced Imaging With High Parallel-Imaging Factors Using a 60-Channel Receiver Coil Setup: Comparison With The Standard Coil Setup.
    Weiss J; Martirosian P; Wolf S; Horger W; Taron J; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M; Othman AE
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Oct; 53(10):602-608. PubMed ID: 29762258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM; Dance DR
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.