BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33934620)

  • 1. Implant survival and functional results of endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal femoral metastases with pathological fractures.
    Sofulu O; Sirin E; Saglam F; Tokyay A; Igrek S; Erol B
    Hip Int; 2022 Mar; 32(2):174-184. PubMed ID: 33934620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?
    Peterson JR; Decilveo AP; O'Connor IT; Golub I; Wittig JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):745-756. PubMed ID: 27052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur.
    Angelini A; Trovarelli G; Berizzi A; Pala E; Breda A; Maraldi M; Ruggieri P
    Injury; 2018 Nov; 49 Suppl 3():S77-S83. PubMed ID: 30415673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur.
    Chandrasekar CR; Grimer RJ; Carter SR; Tillman RM; Abudu A; Buckley L
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 19092014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncological and functional results after surgical treatment of bone metastases at the proximal femur.
    Guzik G
    BMC Surg; 2018 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 29370790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interlocking reconstruction-mode stem-sideplates preserve at-risk hips with short residual proximal femora.
    Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Yakoub MA; Healey JH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Feb; 103-B(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 33517739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is osseous reattachment of the greater trochanter necessary compared to soft-tissue-only abductor repair in proximal femoral megaprosthesis reconstruction?
    Groundland J; Brown J; Jones K; Randall RL
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 124(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 33765357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases.
    Harvey N; Ahlmann ER; Allison DC; Wang L; Menendez LR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 470(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 21879409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement for Salvage of Failed Fixation of Malignant Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures.
    Johnson JD; Perry KI; Yuan BJ; Rose PS; Houdek MT
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):700-703. PubMed ID: 30606513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?
    Chafey DH; Lewis VO; Satcher RL; Moon BS; Lin PP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2392-2401. PubMed ID: 30299285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Pathological Lesions and Fractures of the Proximal Femur].
    Urban M; Luňáček L; Bartoška R; Maléř J; Skála-Rosenbaum J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2023; 90(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 37156003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee.
    Zhang C; Hu J; Zhu K; Cai T; Ma X
    Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):927-938. PubMed ID: 29427125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical management of metastatic lesions of the proximal femur with pathological fractures using intramedullary nailing or endoprosthetic replacement.
    Yu Z; Xiong Y; Shi R; Min L; Zhang W; Liu H; Fang X; Tu C; Duan H
    Mol Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 8(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 29399352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compliant Compression Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur Is Durable Despite Minimal Bone Formation in the Compression Segment.
    Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Fabbri N; Healey JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jul; 479(7):1577-1585. PubMed ID: 33595932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intramedullary nailing has sufficient durability for metastatic femoral fractures.
    Tanaka T; Imanishi J; Charoenlap C; Choong PF
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 14():80. PubMed ID: 26966046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional outcome of endoprosthetic proximal femoral replacement.
    Ogilvie CM; Wunder JS; Ferguson PC; Griffin AM; Bell RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Sep; (426):44-8. PubMed ID: 15346050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures.
    Steensma M; Boland PJ; Morris CD; Athanasian E; Healey JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 470(3):920-6. PubMed ID: 21879407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Factors Are Associated With Implant Breakage and Revision After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Metastases?
    Willeumier JJ; Kaynak M; van der Zwaal P; Meylaerts SAG; Mathijssen NMC; Jutte PC; Tsagozis P; Wedin R; van de Sande MAJ; Fiocco M; Dijkstra PDS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Sep; 476(9):1823-1833. PubMed ID: 30566108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.
    Benevenia J; Kirchner R; Patterson F; Beebe K; Wirtz DC; Rivero S; Palma M; Friedrich MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 26475032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early Improvement in Pain and Functional Outcome but Not Quality of Life After Surgery for Metastatic Long Bone Disease.
    Nooh A; Goulding K; Isler MH; Mottard S; Arteau A; Dion N; Turcotte R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Mar; 476(3):535-545. PubMed ID: 29529637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.