These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33934717)

  • 1. Subfascial-located contraceptive devices requiring surgical removal.
    Hellwinkel JE; Konigsberg MW; Oviedo J; Castaño PM; Kadiyala RK
    Contracept Reprod Med; 2021 May; 6(1):13. PubMed ID: 33934717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of Patients Requiring Surgical Removal of Subdermal Contraceptive Implants: A Case-Control Study.
    Katabi L; Stevens E; Ascha M; Arora K
    Open Access J Contracept; 2022; 13():111-119. PubMed ID: 35968271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of nonpalpable etonogestrel implants after fixation with a curved needle-A case series
    El-Hadad S; Villars P; Kahr MK; Leeners B
    Contraception; 2021 Nov; 104(5):577-580. PubMed ID: 34245721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nexplanon removal from intramuscular implantation in biceps: case report.
    Kong AC; Alfonso MN; Pineda DE; Thorpe MS; Miki RA
    Radiol Case Rep; 2021 Dec; 16(12):3973-3976. PubMed ID: 34729127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Referral Center Experience With Nonpalpable Contraceptive Implant Removals.
    Matulich MC; Chen MJ; Schimmoeller NR; Hsia JK; Uhm S; Wilson MD; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 134(4):801-806. PubMed ID: 31503148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Difficult removal of subdermal contraceptive implants: a multidisciplinary approach involving a peripheral nerve expert.
    Odom EB; Eisenberg DL; Fox IK
    Contraception; 2017 Aug; 96(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 28583591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe.
    Jacques T; Brienne C; Henry S; Baffet H; Giraudet G; Demondion X; Cotten A
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1718-1725. PubMed ID: 34651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal of a Nonpalpable Etonogestrel Implant With Preprocedure Ultrasonography and Modified Vasectomy Clamp.
    Chen MJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 126(5):935-938. PubMed ID: 26444124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
    Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US referral center experience removing nonpalpable and difficult contraceptive implants with in-office ultrasonography: A case series.
    Mastey N; Matulich MC; Uhm S; Baker CC; Melo J; Chen MJ; Creinin MD
    Contraception; 2021 Jun; 103(6):428-430. PubMed ID: 33571492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of etonogestrel contraceptive implants in the operating theater: report on 28 cases.
    Vidin E; Garbin O; Rodriguez B; Favre R; Bettahar-Lebugle K
    Contraception; 2007 Jul; 76(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 17586134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion-a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
    Hognert H; Kopp Kallner H; Cameron S; Nyrelli C; Jawad I; Heller R; Aronsson A; Lindh I; Benson L; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2484-2490. PubMed ID: 27664217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experiences of localization and removal of non-palpable subdermal contraceptive implants with ultrasound.
    Kim S; Choi YS; Kim JS; Kim S; Cho S
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2019 May; 62(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 31139592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of a Norplant implant located near a major nerve using interventional radiology-digital subtraction fluoroscopy.
    Sarma SP; Silverstein M; Lewis C
    Contraception; 1998 Dec; 58(6):387-9. PubMed ID: 10095976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The US etonogestrel implant mandatory clinical training and active monitoring programs: 6-year experience.
    Creinin MD; Kaunitz AM; Darney PD; Schwartz L; Hampton T; Gordon K; Rekers H
    Contraception; 2017 Feb; 95(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 27452317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurovascular injury during removal of levonorgestrel implants.
    Sarma SP; Hatcher RP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1):120-1. PubMed ID: 7847517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difficult etonogestrel implant removals in South Africa: A review of 74 referred cases.
    Petro G; Spence T; Patel M; Gertz AM; Morroni C
    Contraception; 2020 Aug; 102(2):129-132. PubMed ID: 32339484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of age on tolerability, safety and effectiveness of subdermal contraceptive implants.
    López Del Cerro E; Serrano Diana C; Castillo Cañadas AM; González Mirasol E; García Santos F; Gómez García MT; González de Merlo G
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Oct; 38(7):979-984. PubMed ID: 29553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of etonogestrel implant beyond approved duration: prolonged contraceptive effectiveness.
    Ribeiro BC; Nogueira-Silva C; Afonso H; Silva PO; Reis ID
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Aug; 23(4):309-310. PubMed ID: 30203680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ulnar nerve injury associated with removal of Norplant implants.
    Smith JM; Conwit RA; Blumenthal PD
    Contraception; 1998 Feb; 57(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 9589836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.